Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;135(Pt 1):228-41.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr309. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Theory of mind impairments in patients with semantic dementia

Affiliations

Theory of mind impairments in patients with semantic dementia

Céline Duval et al. Brain. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Semantic dementia is characterized by semantic deficits and behavioural abnormalities that occur in the wake of bilateral inferolateral and predominantly left-sided anterior temporal lobe atrophy. The temporal poles have been shown to be involved in theory of mind, namely the ability to ascribe cognitive and affective mental states to others that regulates social interactions by predicting and interpreting human behaviour. However, very few studies have examined theory of mind in semantic dementia. In this study, we investigated both cognitive and affective theory of mind in a group of patients with semantic dementia, using separate objective and subjective assessment tasks. Results provided objective evidence of an impact of semantic dementia on cognitive and affective theory of mind, consistent with the patients' atrophy in the left temporal lobe and hypometabolism in the temporal lobes and the medial frontal cortex. However, the subjective assessment of theory of mind suggested that awareness of the affective but not cognitive theory of mind deficit persists into the moderate stage of the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Clusters of significant (p<0.01 family-wise error corrected) atrophy (A), and hypometabolism (B), in patients with SD compared to controls, as superimposed onto coronal slices of the Montreal National Institute template.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Example of story (first order) used in the false belief task.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Fig 3A. Choices of responses on the Tom’s taste. CR: correct response; C-P: response taking the context into account but not Tom’s preference; PC: response taking Tom’s preference into account but not the context; UR: unsuitable response Fig 3B. Justifications of responses on the Tom’s taste. P: justified according to Tom’s preference; C: justified according to the context; Self: justified according to participant’s own preference in the context; Other: any other justifications.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abu-Akel A. A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind. Brain Res Rev. 2003;43:29–40. - PubMed
    1. Adenzato M, Cavallo M, Enrici I. Theory of mind ability in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: an analysis of the neural, cognitive, and social levels. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:2–12. - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R. Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2002;1:21–62. - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R, Baron-Cohen S, Tranel D. Impaired recognition of social emotions following amygdala damage. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002;14:1264–1274. - PubMed
    1. Anderson AK, Spencer DD, Fulbright RK, Phelps EA. Contribution of the anteromedial temporal lobes to the evaluation of facial emotion. Neuropsychology. 2000;14:526–536. - PubMed

Publication types