Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 10:12:25.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-25.

An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion

Anthony Shakeshaft  1 , Dennis Petrie, Christopher Doran, Courtney Breen, Robert Sanson-Fisher
Affiliations

An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion

Anthony Shakeshaft et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Given limited research evidence for community-based alcohol interventions, this study examines the intervention preferences of rural communities and alcohol professionals, and factors that influence their choices.

Method: Community preferences were identified by a survey of randomly selected individuals across 20 regional Australian communities. The preferences of alcohol professionals were identified by a survey of randomly selected members of the Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs. To identify preferred interventions and the extent of support for them, a budget allocation exercise was embedded in both surveys, asking respondents to allocate a given budget to different interventions. Tobit regression models were estimated to identify the characteristics that explain differences in intervention preferences.

Results: Community respondents selected school programs most often (88.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by promotion of safer drinking (71.3%), community programs (61.4%) and police enforcement of alcohol laws (60.4%). Professionals selected GP training most often (61.0%) and allocated it the largest proportion of funds, followed by school programs (36.6%), community programs (33.8%) and promotion of safer drinking (31.7%). Community views were susceptible to response bias. There were no significant predictors of professionals' preferences.

Conclusions: In the absence of sufficient research evidence for effective community-based alcohol interventions, rural communities and professionals both strongly support school programs, promotion of safer drinking and community programs. Rural communities also supported police enforcement of alcohol laws and professionals supported GP training. The impact of a combination of these strategies needs to be rigorously evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention and resource allocation preferences from a randomly selected sample of rural community residents (N = 2,811).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rehm J, Room R, Monteiro M. et al. Alcohol as a risk factor for global burden of disease. Eur Addict Res. 2003;9:157–164. doi: 10.1159/000072222. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, The burden of disease and injury in Australia, 200. Canberra, Australia: The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007.
    1. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The Costs of Tobacco, Alcohol and Illicit Drugs to Australian Society in 2004/5. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, 2008. National Drug Strategy Monograph 64;
    1. Laslett AM, Catalano P, Chikritzhs T, Dale C, Doran C, Ferris J, Jainullabudeen T, Livingston M, Matthews S, Mugavin J, Room R, Schlotterlein M, Wilkinson C. The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to other. Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Eastern Health, Fitzroy, Victoria: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research; 2010.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2004 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra; 2005.

Publication types