Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index
- PMID: 22233783
- PMCID: PMC3284462
- DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-1
Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index
Abstract
Background: The importance of appropriately selecting patients based on factors such as bone mineral density, body mass index, age, gender, and femoral component size has been demonstrated in many studies as an aid in decreasing the rate of revisions and improving the outcomes for patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA); however, there are few published studies quantitatively specifying the potential risk factors that affect early femoral component failures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the specific causes of early femoral component failures in hip resurfacing separately and more carefully in order to develop strategies to prevent these failures, rather than excluding groups of patients from this surgical procedure.
Methods: This retrospective study included 373 metal-on-metal HRAs performed by a single surgeon using the vascular sparing posterior minimally invasive surgical approach. The average length of follow-up was 30 ± 6 months. In order to understand the causes of early femoral failure rate, a multivariable logistic regression model was generated in order to analyze the effects of bone mineral density (T-score), gender, diagnosis, body mass index, femoral implant fixation type, age, and femoral component size.
Results: The average post-operative Harris hip score was 92 ± 11 points and the average post-operative UCLA score was 7 ± 2 points. There were three revisions due to femoral neck fracture and two for femoral component loosening. These occurred in two female and three male patients. In the multi-variable regression model, only T-score and body mass index showed significant effects on the failure rate of femoral components. Patients with a lower T-score and a higher body mass index had a significantly increased risk of early femoral component failure.
Conclusion: We recommend that dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan T-score tests should be routinely performed on all hip resurfacing patients pre-operatively. If a patient has a low T-score (≤ -1.5), consideration should be given to additional precautions or treatments to alleviate his or her risk, especially when the patient has a higher body mass index (≥ 29 kg/m2).
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1045-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31811. Bone Joint J. 2013. PMID: 23908418
-
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2705-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01563. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 18056503
-
Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3412-3420. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 May 25. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28641972 Clinical Trial.
-
Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9;34(9):e439-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-21. Orthopedics. 2011. PMID: 21902124 Review.
-
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.002. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20399365 Review.
Cited by
-
[Conservative treatment of chronic tendinopathies].Orthopade. 2014 Feb;43(2):183-93. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2249-z. Orthopade. 2014. PMID: 24464332 German.
-
Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1139-45. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2240-7. Epub 2013 Dec 28. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24370976 Free PMC article.
-
Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Mar;9(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9326-y. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016. PMID: 26803608 Free PMC article.
-
The Importance of Bone Mineral Density in Hip Arthroplasty: Results of a Survey Asking Orthopaedic Surgeons about Their Opinions and Attitudes Concerning Osteoporosis and Hip Arthroplasty.Adv Orthop. 2016;2016:8079354. doi: 10.1155/2016/8079354. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Adv Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27999686 Free PMC article.
-
Partial versus early full weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Feb 17;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0527-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28212661 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mont MA, Schmalzried TP. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):3–11. - PubMed
-
- Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):98–103. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous