Anthracyclines

Abstract

After twenty years, understanding the mechanisms of tumor cells kill by anthracyclines still remains an active area of research. Of many mechanisms described for this class of drugs, efforts in the last year have focused on defining the role of free radical formation, topoisomerase II-induced DNA breakage, and P-170-dependent cellular accumulation of anthracyclines in tumor cell kill and resistance. First, in a number of tumor cell lines, the formation of free radical species from anthracyclines has been implicated in the cell killing. Modulation of detoxification pathways in a drug-resistant cell line e.g depletion of GSH, a substrate for peroxidase and transferase, enhanced both the formation of oxy-radicals and adriamycin cytotoxicity. It should be noted, however, that these findings are not true for every cell line examined, and free radical-mediated tumor kill may be cell- or tissue-specific. Second, anthracyclines-mediated topo II-dependent DNA cleavage was observed in most cell lines and reduced breaks were found in resistant cells. The decrease in single-strand breaks, however, neither correlated with the degree of resistance nor with differences in the relative topo II activity, which was in most cases only two-fold less in resistant cells than in sensitive cells. Finally, the reduced accumulation of the drug does not appear to be the only contributing factor in multidrug resistant cells and P-170 is not the only protein overexpressed in certain cells, e.g., an 85,000 Da protein may also be linked to adriamycin resistance. Although GST protein is overexpressed in most adriamycin resistant cells along with mdr1 gene, current evidence suggests that this protein may not be directly involved in adriamycin resistance. Taken together, both the mechanism of action and resistance to this class of drug likely vary among cell lines. Clinical studies in the past year have brought about interesting refinements in anthracycline-containing chemotherapy; ICRF-187 (by itself also cytotoxic) seems to offer protection against cardiac toxicity, while implicating iron in the mediation of cardiac damage. Out of a large number of newer anthracycline derivatives, clinical evidence indicates only a modest increase in therapeutic index with a few analogs, perhaps idarubicin and epirubicin. It is not yet clear that being able to receive more milligrams (or more cycles) of anthracycline eventually translates into a significantly better response rate or in a survival advantage. Much less clear is whether patients refractory to adriamycin may derive any benefit from newer anthracyclines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)