Dressing change reduces the central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection
- PMID: 22234057
- DOI: 10.5754/hge09563
Dressing change reduces the central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection
Abstract
Background/aims: To compare the time interval from insertion until development of central venous catheter related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI) between patients who received non-routine dressing change group (Group 1) and patients who received routine dressing change group (Group 2).
Methodology: Between March 2006 and July 2008, patients who underwent CVC were randomly divided into Groups 1 and 2. Comparative study between the two groups was performed by reference to the incidences of CVC-RBSI from the prospectively obtained database.
Results: One hundred-eighty nine patients underwent 530 CVC insertions. Group 1 had 254 CVCs and Group 2 had 276 CVCs. There were no significant inter-group differences in patient background factors, except for gender. In addition, Group 1 had a shorter duration of catheter insertion than Group 2. Nevertheless, Group 1 had not only a significantly shorter period from insertion until the development of CVC-RBSI but also a higher frequency of fever than Group 2.
Conclusions: The results of our comparison between non-routine dressing change group and routine dressing change group indicate that routine dressing change can reduce the incidence of CVC-RBSI in patients undergoing CVC insertions.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine as cutaneous disinfectant for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparative study.Eur Surg Res. 2009;43(3):286-90. doi: 10.1159/000231709. Epub 2009 Aug 1. Eur Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19648751
-
Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Jun;23(5):829-36. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996. PMID: 8792352 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial.Ann Hematol. 2009 Mar;88(3):267-72. doi: 10.1007/s00277-008-0568-7. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Ann Hematol. 2009. PMID: 18679683 Clinical Trial.
-
Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications.Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jan;28(1):18-28. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1156-7. Epub 2001 Nov 29. Intensive Care Med. 2002. PMID: 11818995 Review.
-
Prevention of central venous catheter bloodstream infections.J Intensive Care Med. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):131-8. doi: 10.1177/0885066609358952. Epub 2010 Jan 19. J Intensive Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20089527 Review.
Cited by
-
Frequency of dressing changes for central venous access devices on catheter-related infections.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 1;2(2):CD009213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009213.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26827714 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0174164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174164. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28323880 Free PMC article.