Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;11(1):14-23.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0517.

Oncogenic viruses and tumor glucose metabolism: like kids in a candy store

Affiliations
Review

Oncogenic viruses and tumor glucose metabolism: like kids in a candy store

Evan Noch et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Oncogenic viruses represent a significant public health burden in light of the multitude of malignancies that result from chronic or spontaneous viral infection and transformation. Although many of the molecular signaling pathways that underlie virus-mediated cellular transformation are known, the impact of these viruses on metabolic signaling and phenotype within proliferating tumor cells is less well understood. Whether the interaction of oncogenic viruses with metabolic signaling pathways involves enhanced glucose uptake and glycolysis (both hallmark features of transformed cells) or dysregulation of molecular pathways that regulate oxidative stress, viruses are adept at facilitating tumor expansion. Through their effects on cell proliferation pathways, such as the PI3K and MAPK pathways, the cell cycle regulatory proteins p53 and ATM, and the cell stress response proteins HIF-1α and AMPK, viruses exert control over critical metabolic signaling cascades. Additionally, oncogenic viruses modulate the tumor metabolomic profile through direct and indirect interactions with glucose transporters, such as GLUT1, and specific glycolytic enzymes, including pyruvate kinase, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and hexokinase. Through these pathways, oncogenic viruses alter the phenotypic characteristics and energy-use methods of transformed cells; therefore, it may be possible to develop novel antiglycolytic therapies to target these dysregulated pathways in virus-derived malignancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Oncogenic viruses exert metabolic control through the regulation of cellular growth, cell cycle, and cell stress signals
Oncogenic viruses, including Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and polyoma viruses, induce cellular proliferation through the PI3K and MAPK pathways and inhibit cell cycle arrest and DNA damage responses through inhibition of p53 and ATM. On the other hand, these viruses induce hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression as well as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent signaling. As a result, these pathways activate oxidative stress, glucose transport, and glycolytic metabolism.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Oncogenic viruses regulate glucose uptake and glycolytic flux in transformed cells Glucose uptake processes are enhanced by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) induces trafficking of the GLUT1 transporter to the plasma membrane. HTLV-1 utilizes the GLUT1 transporter to enter and infect cells, where it may then induce subsequent tumor formation. RSV enhances the activities of key glycolytic enzymes, including hexokinase (HK), glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), and phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK-1), all of which contribute to enhanced glycolytic ATP production. SV40 enhances transaldolase (TALDO) activity, providing nucleotide precursors and sufficient NADPH reducing equivalents for cellular demands. The M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (M2PK) is affected by multiple viruses, such as HPV, RSV, and HCV, which activate and induce changes in M2PK structure. In addition, HCV enhances lactate production while inhibiting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, thus promoting glycolytic flux.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saha A, Murakami M, Kumar P, Bajaj B, Sims K, Robertson ES. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C augments Mdm2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by deubiquitinating Mdm2. J Virol. 2009;83:4652–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krynska B, Del Valle L, Gordon J, Otte J, Croul S, Khalili K. Identification of a novel p53 mutation in JCV-induced mouse medulloblastoma. Virology. 2000;274:65–74. - PubMed
    1. Giampieri S, Garcia-Escudero R, Green J, Storey A. Human papillomavirus type 77 E6 protein selectively inhibits p53-dependent transcription of proapoptotic genes following UV-B irradiation. Oncogene. 2004;23:5864–70. - PubMed
    1. O’Shaughnessy RF, Akgul B, Storey A, Pfister H, Harwood CA, Byrne C. Cutaneous human papillomaviruses down-regulate AKT1, whereas AKT2 up-regulation and activation associates with tumors. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8207–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosl F, Das BC, Lengert M, Geletneky K, zur Hausen H. Antioxidant-induced changes of the AP-1 transcription complex are paralleled by a selective suppression of human papillomavirus transcription. J Virol. 1997;71:362–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types