Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment
- PMID: 22236356
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x
Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment
Abstract
Aims: Antibody formation to therapeutic peptides is common. This analysis characterizes the time-course and cross-reactivity of anti-exenatide antibodies and potential effects on efficacy and safety.
Methods: Data from intent-to-treat patients in 12 controlled (n = 2225,12-52 weeks) and 5 uncontrolled (n = 1538, up to 3 years) exenatide twice-daily (BID) trials and 4 controlled (n = 653,24-30 weeks) exenatide once weekly (QW) trials with 1 uncontrolled period (n = 128,52 weeks) were analysed.
Results: Mean titres peaked early (6-22 weeks) and subsequently declined. At 30 weeks, 36.7% of exenatide BID patients were antibody-positive; 31.7% exhibited low titres (≤125) and 5.0% had higher titres (≥625). Antibody incidence declined to 16.9% (1.4% higher titre) at 3 years. Similarly, 56.8% of exenatide QW patients were antibody-positive (45.0% low/11.8% higher titre) at 24-30 weeks, declining to 45.4% positive (9.2% higher titre) at 52 weeks. Treatment-emergent anti-exenatide antibodies from a subset of patients tested did not cross-react with human GLP-1 or glucagon. Other than injection-site reactions, adverse event rates in antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients were similar. Efficacy was robust in both antibody-negative and antibody-positive patients (mean HbA1c change: -1.0 and -0.9%, respectively, exenatide BID; -1.6% and -1.3% exenatide QW). No correlation between change in HbA1c and titre was observed for exenatide BID, although mean reductions were attenuated in the small subset of patients (5%) with higher titres. A significant correlation was observed for exenatide QW with no difference between antibody-negative and low-titre patients, but an attenuated mean reduction in the subset of patients (12%) with higher titres.
Conclusions: Low-titre anti-exenatide antibodies were common with exenatide treatment (32% exenatide BID, 45% exenatide QW patients), but had no apparent effect on efficacy. Higher-titre antibodies were less common (5% exenatide BID, 12% exenatide QW) and within that titre group, increasing antibody titre was associated with reduced average efficacy that was statistically significant for exenatide QW. Other than injection-site reactions, anti-exenatide antibodies did not impact the safety of exenatide.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00035984 NCT00039013 NCT00039026 NCT00044668 NCT00082381 NCT00082407 NCT00099320 NCT00099333 NCT00099619 NCT00111540 NCT00135330 NCT00308139 NCT00324363 NCT00381342 NCT00382239 NCT00637273 NCT00641056 NCT00877890.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Liraglutide treatment is associated with a low frequency and magnitude of antibody formation with no apparent impact on glycemic response or increased frequency of adverse events: results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) trials.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jun;96(6):1695-702. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2822. Epub 2011 Mar 30. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011. PMID: 21450987 Clinical Trial.
-
Exenatide BID and liraglutide QD treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in Germany.J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):746-57. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.679756. Epub 2012 Apr 3. J Med Econ. 2012. PMID: 22443463
-
DURATION-1: exenatide once weekly produces sustained glycemic control and weight loss over 52 weeks.Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1255-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1914. Epub 2010 Mar 9. Diabetes Care. 2010. PMID: 20215461 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical implications of exenatide as a twice-daily or once-weekly therapy for type 2 diabetes.Postgrad Med. 2011 Sep;123(5):228-38. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2479. Postgrad Med. 2011. PMID: 21904106 Review.
-
Effects of exenatide twice daily, exenatide once weekly or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes and baseline HbA1c ≥10.0%: Two pooled analyses including 20 randomised controlled trials.Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;71(12). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13029. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Int J Clin Pract. 2017. PMID: 29044860 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in pharmacologic therapies for type 2 diabetes.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013 Feb;15(2):302. doi: 10.1007/s11883-012-0302-8. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013. PMID: 23299642 Review.
-
A Review of the Long-Term Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly for Type 2 Diabetes.Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1791-1814. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0499-6. Epub 2017 Jul 3. Adv Ther. 2017. PMID: 28674957 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring vervet monkeys.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Feb;236(2):603-611. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5089-z. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019. PMID: 30382353 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Tolerability of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Utilizing Data from the Exenatide Clinical Trial Development Program.Curr Diab Rep. 2016 May;16(5):44. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0728-4. Curr Diab Rep. 2016. PMID: 27037706 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of taspoglutide versus sitagliptin for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T-emerge 4 trial).Diabetes Ther. 2012 Dec;3(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s13300-012-0013-8. Epub 2012 Nov 9. Diabetes Ther. 2012. PMID: 23138449 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical