Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial
- PMID: 22236885
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial
Abstract
Objective: The Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two devices for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA): (1) a new embolic protection device, the Emboshield Pro (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Ill), using the periprocedural composite end point of 30-day death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (DSMI), and (2) a carotid stent in conjunction with an embolic protection device (EPD) using the DSMI periprocedural composite end point plus ipsilateral stroke at up to 3 years for long-term evaluation.
Methods: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 220 consecutive participants between November 29, 2006, and January 14, 2008, followed by a second cohort of 102 participants between January 14 and June 18, 2008. Enrolled participants had carotid stenosis (symptomatic >50% or asymptomatic >80%). The first 220 subjects underwent distal EPD placement with a new large-diameter filter, and the second cohort of 102 underwent placement of an older EPD that is no longer manufactured. All 322 participants were to be treated with a dedicated carotid stent with a tapered, small, closed-cell design (Xact; Abbott Vascular) and were to be included in the long-term evaluation. Independent neurologic assessment was performed before CAS and at 1 day, 30 days, and annually after CAS. All primary end point events were independently adjudicated by a central committee.
Results: The periprocedural composite end point of DSMI (95% confidence interval) in the first 220 participants was 2.3% (0.74%, 5.22%), with a combined death and stroke rate of 1.8% (0.50%, 4.59%) and a rate of death and major stroke of 0.5% (0.01%, 2.51%). As of January 3, 2011, the median follow-up for the entire 322-subject cohort for the long-term evaluation was 2.8 years. Freedom from the periprocedural composite of DSMI plus ipsilateral stroke thereafter was 95.4%, with an annualized ipsilateral stroke rate of 0.4%.
Conclusions: CAS outcomes in patients at high risk for CEA have improved from earlier carotid stent trials. With periprocedural rates of DSMI of 2.3%, death or stroke at 1.8%, and death or major stroke rate of 0.5%, PROTECT has the lowest rate of periprocedural complications among other comparable single-arm CAS trials in patients at high risk for CEA.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Invited commentary.J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):977. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.001. J Vasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22464459 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):172-84. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.262. Epub 2010 Oct 11. Arch Neurol. 2011. PMID: 20937941
-
Proximal versus distal embolic protection for carotid artery stenting: a national cardiovascular data registry analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.001. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25907088
-
Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal is a safe technique for high-risk patients older than 70 years.J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):978-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.084. Epub 2012 Feb 7. J Vasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22322116
-
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022. Am J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18154764 Review.
-
Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: updated meta-analysis, metaregression and trial sequential analysis of short-term and intermediate-to long-term outcomes of randomized trials.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Aug;57(4):519-39. Epub 2016 Feb 17. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016. PMID: 26883249 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36013058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical study of stent forming for symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20637. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020637. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32569194 Free PMC article.
-
State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Jun;7(4):446-57. doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9567-3. Epub 2014 Apr 26. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014. PMID: 24771314 Review.
-
Comparison and Analysis between the NAV6 Embolic Protection Filter and SpiderFX EPD Filter in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions.J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;2021:9047596. doi: 10.1155/2021/9047596. eCollection 2021. J Interv Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34149323 Free PMC article.
-
Enlarged Parent Artery Lumen at Aneurysmal-Neck Segment in Wide-Necked Distal Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms.Neurointervention. 2015 Sep;10(2):82-8. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.82. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Neurointervention. 2015. PMID: 26389011 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials