Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children
- PMID: 22238470
- PMCID: PMC3266136
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir816
Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children
Abstract
Background: Children have a lower response rate to antimonial drugs and higher elimination rate of antimony (Sb) than adults. Oral miltefosine has not been evaluated for pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Methods: A randomized, noninferiority clinical trial with masked evaluation was conducted at 3 locations in Colombia where Leishmania panamensis and Leishmania guyanensis predominated. One hundred sixteen children aged 2-12 years with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis were randomized to directly observed treatment with meglumine antimoniate (20 mg Sb/kg/d for 20 days; intramuscular) (n = 58) or miltefosine (1.8-2.5 mg/kg/d for 28 days; by mouth) (n = 58). Primary outcome was treatment failure at or before week 26 after initiation of treatment. Miltefosine was noninferior if the proportion of treatment failures was ≤15% higher than achieved with meglumine antimoniate (1-sided test, α = .05).
Results: Ninety-five percent of children (111/116) completed follow-up evaluation. By intention-to-treat analysis, failure rate was 17.2% (98% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-28.7%) for miltefosine and 31% (98% CI, 16.9%-45.2%) for meglumine antimoniate. The difference between treatment groups was 13.8%, (98% CI, -4.5% to 32%) (P = .04). Adverse events were mild for both treatments.
Conclusions: Miltefosine is noninferior to meglumine antimoniate for treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) species. Advantages of oral administration and low toxicity favor use of miltefosine in children.
Clinical trial registration: NCT00487253.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of miltefosine for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):351-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0060. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010. PMID: 20682881 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Apr 6;11(4):e0005459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005459. eCollection 2017 Apr. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. PMID: 28384261 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparative study between oral miltefosine and parenteral N-metil glucamine antimoniate for the treatment of experimental leishmaniasis caused Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis].Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008 Jul-Aug;41(4):424-7. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822008000400022. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008. PMID: 18853022 Portuguese.
-
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD004834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004834.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32853410 Free PMC article.
-
American tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil: a critical review of the current therapeutic approach with systemic meglumine antimoniate and short-term possibilities for an alternative treatment.Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Apr;24(4):380-391. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13210. Epub 2019 Feb 19. Trop Med Int Health. 2019. PMID: 30681239 Review.
Cited by
-
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Current Treatment Practices in the USA for Returning Travelers.Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;7(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s40506-015-0038-4. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25788870 Free PMC article.
-
The Binomial Parasite-Host Immunity in the Healing Process and in Reactivation of Human Tegumentary Leishmaniasis.Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 19;9:1308. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01308. eCollection 2018. Front Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29971054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Novel arylalkylamine compounds exhibits potent selective antiparasitic activity against Leishmania major.Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015 Nov 15;25(22):5315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015. PMID: 26410073 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review update.PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e61843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061843. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23637917 Free PMC article.
-
Tolerability and Safety of Miltefosine for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 19;9(9):218. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9090218. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39330907 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Campbell-Lendrum D, Dujardin JP, Martinez E, et al. Domestic and peridomestic transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis: changing epidemiological patterns present new control opportunities. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:159–62. - PubMed
-
- Munoz G, Davies CR. Leishmania panamensis transmission in the domestic environment: the results of a prospective epidemiological survey in Santander, Colombia. Biomedica. 2006;26(Suppl 1):131–44. - PubMed
-
- Urbanization: an increasing risk factor for leishmaniasis. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2002;77:365–70. - PubMed
-
- Yadon ZE, Rodrigues LC, Davies CR, Quigley MA. Indoor and peridomestic transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in northwestern Argentina: a retrospective case-control study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:519–26. - PubMed
-
- Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Gongora R, Prager M, et al. Etiologic agent of an epidemic of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tolima, Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:276–82. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical