Factors that influence parents' experiences with results disclosure after newborn screening identifies genetic carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy
- PMID: 22240007
- PMCID: PMC3328613
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.007
Factors that influence parents' experiences with results disclosure after newborn screening identifies genetic carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy
Abstract
Objective: Newborn screening (NBS) identifies genetic carriers for sickle cell hemoglobinopathy and cystic fibrosis. We aimed to identify factors during initial NBS carrier results disclosure by primary care providers (PCPs) that influenced parents' experiences and reactions.
Methods: Open-ended responses from telephone interviews with 270 parents of carriers were analyzed using mixed-methods. Conventional content analysis identified influential factors; chi-square tests analyzed relationships between factors and parent-reported reactions.
Results: Parents reported positive (35%) or negative (31%) reactions to results disclosure. Parents' experiences were influenced by specific factors: content messages (72%), PCP traits (47%), and aspects of the setting (30%). Including at least one of five specific content messages was associated (p<0.05) with positive parental reactions; omitting at least one of four specific content messages was associated (p<0.05) with negative parental reactions. Parents reported positive reactions when PCPs avoided jargon or were perceived as calm. Parents reported negative reactions to jargon usage and results disclosure by voicemail.
Conclusion: Parents identified aspects of PCP communication which influenced their reactions and results disclosure experiences.
Practice implications: Our findings suggest ways PCPs may improve communication of carrier results. PCPs should provide specific content messages and consider how their actions, characteristics, and setting can influence parental reactions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Experience with Parent Follow-Up for Communication Outcomes after Newborn Screening Identifies Carrier Status.J Pediatr. 2020 Sep;224:37-43.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 May 6. J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32386871 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative secondary evaluation of statewide follow-up interviews for abnormal newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy.Genet Med. 2012 Feb;14(2):207-14. doi: 10.1038/gim.0b013e31822dd7b8. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22261754 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care providers' experiences notifying parents of cystic fibrosis newborn screening results.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Jan;54(1):67-75. doi: 10.1177/0009922814545619. Epub 2014 Aug 6. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015. PMID: 25104730 Free PMC article.
-
Breaking the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis to parents: A process not a one-off event.Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep;35:103-105. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 17. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020. PMID: 32409170 Review.
-
Exploring Parents' Experiences and Needs During Disclosure of a Cerebral Palsy Diagnosis of Their Young Child: A Scoping Review.Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Nov;50(6):e13327. doi: 10.1111/cch.13327. Child Care Health Dev. 2024. PMID: 39343726
Cited by
-
Healthcare professionals' and parents' experiences of the confirmatory testing period: a qualitative study of the UK expanded newborn screening pilot.BMC Pediatr. 2017 May 8;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0873-1. BMC Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28482885 Free PMC article.
-
Patient vs Clinician Perspectives on Communication About Results of Lung Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study.Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1240-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.081. Epub 2020 May 7. Chest. 2020. PMID: 32387521 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;11(5):507. doi: 10.3390/children11050507. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38790502 Free PMC article.
-
Parental Preferences about Policy Options Regarding Disclosure of Incidental Genetic Findings in Newborn Screening: Using Videos and the Internet to Educate and Obtain Input.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Sep 27;8(4):54. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040054. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022. PMID: 36278624 Free PMC article.
-
Processing of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Congenital Hypothyroidism: A Qualitative Exploration of Current Practice in England.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Oct 13;7(4):64. doi: 10.3390/ijns7040064. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021. PMID: 34698074 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, National Newborn Screening Status Report. 2011 [cited March 31, 2011]; Available from: http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/nbsdisorders.pdf.
-
- Farrell MH, Certain L, Farrell PM. Genetic counseling and risk communication services of newborn screening programs. Arch Ped Adol Med. 2001;155:120–6. - PubMed
-
- Beucher J, Leray E, Deneuville E, Roblin M, Pin I, Bremont F, Turck D, Ginies JL, Foucaud P, Rault G, Derelle J, David V, Journel H, Marchand S, Veillard D, Roussey M. Psychological effects of false-positive results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a two-year follow-up. J Pediatr. 2010;156:771–6. 776, e1. - PubMed
-
- Hofman KJ, Tambor ES, Chase GA, Geller G, Faden RR, Holtzman NA. Physicians’ knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Acad Med. 1993;68:625–32. - PubMed
-
- Kai J, Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N. Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–82. iii. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous