Do practicing clinicians agree with expert ratings of neonatal intensive care unit quality measures?
- PMID: 22241483
- PMCID: PMC3963391
- DOI: 10.1038/jp.2011.199
Do practicing clinicians agree with expert ratings of neonatal intensive care unit quality measures?
Abstract
Objective: To assess the level of agreement when selecting quality measures for inclusion in a composite index of neonatal intensive care quality (Baby-MONITOR) between two panels: one comprised of academic researchers (Delphi) and another comprised of academic and clinical neonatologists (clinician).
Study design: In a modified Delphi process, a panel rated 28 quality measures. We assessed clinician agreement with the Delphi panel by surveying a sample of 48 neonatal intensive care practitioners. We asked the clinician group to indicate their level of agreement with the Delphi panel for each measure using a five-point scale (much too high, slightly too high, reasonable, slightly too low and much too low). In addition, we asked clinicians to select measures for inclusion in the Baby-MONITOR based on a yes or no vote and a pre-specified two-thirds majority for inclusion.
Result: In all, 23 (47.9%) of the clinicians responded to the survey. We found high levels of agreement between the Delphi and clinician panels, particularly across measures selected for the Baby-MONITOR. Clinicians selected the same nine measures for inclusion in the composite as the Delphi panel. For these nine measures, 74% of clinicians indicated that the Delphi panel rating was 'reasonable'.
Conclusion: Practicing clinicians agree with an expert panel on the measures that should be included in the Baby-MONITOR, enhancing face validity.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Profit and Gould are serving as Expert Consultants with the Vermont Oxford Networks NICQ 7 Quality Improvement Collaborative. Dr. Gould is the Principal Investigator for the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative.
Figures

Comment in
-
Neonatology enters the 21st century for health care oversight: the public reporting of health care outcomes.J Perinatol. 2012 Apr;32(4):245-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.13. J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22460598 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Neonatology enters the 21st century for health care oversight: the public reporting of health care outcomes.J Perinatol. 2012 Apr;32(4):245-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.13. J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22460598 No abstract available.
-
Formal selection of measures for a composite index of NICU quality of care: Baby-MONITOR.J Perinatol. 2011 Nov;31(11):702-10. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.12. Epub 2011 Feb 24. J Perinatol. 2011. PMID: 21350429 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Delphi method to develop nursing-sensitive quality indicators for the NICU.J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):502-513. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13474. Epub 2016 Oct 6. J Clin Nurs. 2017. PMID: 27404730
-
Neonatal palliative care: developing consensus among neonatologists using the Delphi technique in Portugal.Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Dec;13(6):408-14. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000037. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013. PMID: 24300959
-
Indicators of outcome quality in peripheral arterial disease revascularisations - a Delphi expert consensus.Vasa. 2018 Oct;47(6):491-497. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000720. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Vasa. 2018. PMID: 29856270 Review.
Cited by
-
The Correlation Between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Safety Culture and Quality of Care.J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e310-e316. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000546. J Patient Saf. 2020. PMID: 30407963 Free PMC article.
-
Baby-MONITOR: a composite indicator of NICU quality.Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):74-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3552. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Pediatrics. 2014. PMID: 24918221 Free PMC article.
-
The Swiss Neonatal Quality Cycle, a monitor for clinical performance and tool for quality improvement.BMC Pediatr. 2013 Sep 28;13:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-152. BMC Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 24074151 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of neonatal intensive care unit performance across multiple measures of quality of care.JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jan;167(1):47-54. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.418. JAMA Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23403539 Free PMC article.
-
The Association of Level of Care With NICU Quality.Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20144210. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-4210. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Pediatrics. 2016. PMID: 26908663 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Premier Inc. Summary of the composite indicator scoring methodology. Available at: www.premierinc.com/all/quality/hqi/methodology.jsp. Accessed on 11.22.2007.
-
- Roland M. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care–a major experiment in the United kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1448–54. - PubMed
-
- Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantolo S, Hoffman A, Giovanini E. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2005.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources