Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 1:43:205-255.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43005-1.

Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question

Affiliations

Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question

Christopher R Jones et al. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. .

Abstract

Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to attitude formation or change toward an object due to that object's mere co-occurrence with another valenced object or objects. This chapter focuses on the "how" question, that is, the question of what cognitive processes intervene between mere co-occurrence and attitude formation or change. Though EC has typically been thought of as occurring through a single, albeit contentious, mechanism, we begin by pointing out that both the heterogeneity of EC methodologies and the abundance of inconsistent results suggest that multiple processes with different characteristics can produce EC. We describe how the earliest posited process of EC, Pavlovian conditioning or signal learning, is a valid mechanism of EC that appears to have operated in some experiments but is unlikely to have operated in others and also cannot account for various EC findings. We describe other mechanisms of EC, when they can be expected to occur, and what characteristics they have. We particularly focus our attention on a process model of EC we have recently introduced, the implicit misattribution model. Finally, we describe the implications of a multi-process view of EC, which we argue can help resolve theoretical controversies and further the application of EC as a practical intervention for influencing attitudes in various domains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1980.
    1. Ashby FG, Maddox WT. Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology. 2005;56:149–178. - PubMed
    1. Baeyens F, Eelen P, Van den Bergh O. Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion. 1990;4:3–18.
    1. Baeyens F, Hermans R, Eelen P. The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1993;31:731–737. - PubMed
    1. Bem DJ. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 6. Academic Press; New York: 1972. pp. 1–62.

LinkOut - more resources