Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks
- PMID: 22242016
- PMCID: PMC3252278
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002440
Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks
Abstract
Genome-wide dynamic changes in DNA methylation are indispensable for germline development and genomic imprinting in mammals. Here, we report single-base resolution DNA methylome and transcriptome maps of mouse germ cells, generated using whole-genome shotgun bisulfite sequencing and cDNA sequencing (mRNA-seq). Oocyte genomes showed a significant positive correlation between mRNA transcript levels and methylation of the transcribed region. Sperm genomes had nearly complete coverage of methylation, except in the CpG-rich regions, and showed a significant negative correlation between gene expression and promoter methylation. Thus, these methylome maps revealed that oocytes and sperms are widely different in the extent and distribution of DNA methylation. Furthermore, a comparison of oocyte and sperm methylomes identified more than 1,600 CpG islands differentially methylated in oocytes and sperm (germline differentially methylated regions, gDMRs), in addition to the known imprinting control regions (ICRs). About half of these differentially methylated DNA sequences appear to be at least partially resistant to the global DNA demethylation that occurs during preimplantation development. In the absence of Dnmt3L, neither methylation of most oocyte-methylated gDMRs nor intragenic methylation was observed. There was also genome-wide hypomethylation, and partial methylation at particular retrotransposons, while maintaining global gene expression, in oocytes. Along with the identification of the many Dnmt3L-dependent gDMRs at intragenic regions, the present results suggest that oocyte methylation can be divided into 2 types: Dnmt3L-dependent methylation, which is required for maternal methylation imprinting, and Dnmt3L-independent methylation, which might be essential for endogenous retroviral DNA silencing. The present data provide entirely new perspectives on the evaluation of epigenetic markers in germline cells.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Human Oocyte-Derived Methylation Differences Persist in the Placenta Revealing Widespread Transient Imprinting.PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 11;12(11):e1006427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427. eCollection 2016 Nov. PLoS Genet. 2016. PMID: 27835649 Free PMC article.
-
The loss of imprinted DNA methylation in mouse blastocysts is inflicted to a similar extent by in vitro follicle culture and ovulation induction.Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;22(6):427-41. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw013. Epub 2016 Feb 7. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26908643
-
Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos.Nat Genet. 2011 Jun 26;43(8):811-4. doi: 10.1038/ng.864. Nat Genet. 2011. PMID: 21706000 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal regulation of chromosomal imprinting in animals.Chromosoma. 2019 Jun;128(2):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s00412-018-00690-5. Epub 2019 Feb 5. Chromosoma. 2019. PMID: 30719566 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Germline-derived DNA methylation and early embryo epigenetic reprogramming: The selected survival of imprints.Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015 Oct;67:128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 9. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015. PMID: 25966912 Review.
Cited by
-
Gene and transposable element methylation in great tit (Parus major) brain and blood.BMC Genomics. 2016 May 4;17:332. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2653-y. BMC Genomics. 2016. PMID: 27146629 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in mammalian reproductive biology.Sci China Life Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):18-58. doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-1572-7. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Sci China Life Sci. 2020. PMID: 31813094 Review.
-
Histone H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 form a chromatin platform essential for DNMT3A-dependent DNA methylation in mouse oocytes.Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 3;13(1):4440. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32141-2. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35922445 Free PMC article.
-
Early Expression of Tet1 and Tet2 in Mouse Zygotes Altered DNA Methylation Status and Affected Embryonic Development.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 31;23(15):8495. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158495. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35955629 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data.Genome Biol. 2018 Mar 15;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1408-2. Genome Biol. 2018. PMID: 29544553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:662–673. - PubMed
-
- Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33(Suppl):245–254. - PubMed
-
- Lees-Murdock DJ, Walsh CP. DNA methylation reprogramming in the germ line. Epigenetics. 2008;3:5–13. - PubMed
-
- Sasaki H, Matsui Y. Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:129–140. - PubMed
-
- Bourc'his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, Bollman B, Bestor TH. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science. 2001;294:2536–2539. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources