Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Nov 15;143(10):1017-24.

Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec

Affiliations

Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec

G Goldman et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Repeat cesarean section is a major factor contributing to the rising cesarean section rate. Although vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section (VBAC) is advocated in most cases, it has not yet been adopted as widespread policy. In a case-control study we compared 400 women in Quebec who underwent VBAC with 1600 women who had a repeat cesarean section from 1985 to 1987 in an attempt to identify factors that favour vaginal delivery. Using both simple and multiple logistic regression analyses we examined the effect of independent variables linked to the patients (two variables), the attending physicians (seven) and the hospitals (two) on the dependent variable (type of birth) with the use of odds ratios. We found that the physician characteristics related to type of practice and the degree of hospital specialization were significant factors in predicting the type of delivery. Women who gave birth vaginally were more likely than those who had a repeat cesarean section to be attended by a physician with a specialized practice and to give birth in a hospital providing an intermediate or high level of care. This suggests that VBAC is still perceived as a high-risk option and is managed by only a minority of specialized obstetricians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 15;144(6):671-8 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1983 Jun 3;249(21):2935-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887-92 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 May;65(5):628-32 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources