Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Nov 15;143(10):1025-30.

Hospital-based utilization management: a cross-Canada survey

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Hospital-based utilization management: a cross-Canada survey

G Anderson et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Utilization management attempts to measure, understand and, when appropriate, reduce hospital use. We conducted a telephone survey to determine the status of utilization management in Canadian hospitals. The sample comprised a random selection of 30% of acute-care hospitals with over 100 beds for adults in Ontario and Quebec and all such hospitals in the other provinces. Of the 123 chief executive officers contacted 99 (80%) claimed to have a utilization management program. Of those, 90 (91%) agreed to participate in an in-depth survey or to designate a senior administrator to be interviewed who was most knowledgeable about the program. High occupancy rates and funding issues were the most common environmental triggers for the development of utilization management programs; funding issues were listed more frequently by respondents in Ontario than by those elsewhere (p = 0.0008). Retrospective review alone was used in half of the hospitals, concurrent review or some mixed approach being used in the other half. Ontario and the Atlantic provinces were more reliant than the rest of the country on retrospective review alone (p = 0.0032). Most of the hospitals used peer review and education to stimulate corrective action. Of the respondents 67% indicated that the medical staff supported the utilization management program, and 53% reported that the program had a positive impact on the relationship between administrative and medical staff. Most of the respondents were unsure of the program's impact on the quality of care or the rate of unnecessary hospital admission. However, retrospective review alone was found to be less successful in reducing inappropriate utilization than either concurrent review or combined review (p = 0.0048).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Inquiry. 1978 Jun;15(2):113-28 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 31;313(18):1131-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1989 Jun;27(6):632-47 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1988 May 19;318(20):1310-4 - PubMed
    1. Health Serv Res. 1987 Dec;22(5):709-69 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources