Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice: does sex matter? Results from the carotid artery stenting registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)
- PMID: 22246970
- PMCID: PMC6652720
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.21015
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice: does sex matter? Results from the carotid artery stenting registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is increasingly used for treatment of severe carotid artery stenosis, but only few procedural risk factors for complications of CAS are clearly defined yet. A possible impact of the patient's gender on the outcome of patients undergoing CAS has not been investigated properly and only little information about this topic is available so far.
Methods: We analysed data of the German prospective, multicenter CAS Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte.
Results: From July 1996 to May 2009 5130 patients underwent CAS at 35 German hospitals and were enrolled into the prospective ALKK CAS Registry. Therefrom 1443 (28.1%) patients were female. There was no significant time-related difference in the proportion of women undergoing CAS over the years. Women undergoing CAS were significantly older than men (73 years vs. 70 years, p < 0.01) and had a longer in hospital stay in comparison to men (p < 0.01). The majority of patients treated with CAS was between 60 and 80 years of age (∼73%). No significant differences between women and men could be found regarding in-hospital events like death (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.99), major or minor stroke (1.7% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.97; 1.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.12), TIA (2.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.64), amaurosis fugax (0.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.25) , intracranial bleeding (0.5% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.43), myocardial infarction (0.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.48) or all non-fatal strokes and all death (3.0% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.47). 30 day event rates did not show gender related differences in the combined endpoint of the outcome of patients undergoing CAS, as well (♀ n = 31/882 [3.5%] vs. ♂ n = 109/2273 [4.8%], p = 0.12).
Conclusion: Our results do not suggest any gender-related differences in success rates and complications in CAS. In clinical practice approximately 30% of patients treated with CAS are women. The institutions and people who participated in the ALKK CAS Registry are listed in Zahn et al.16 The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24414075
-
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).Z Kardiol. 2005 Mar;94(3):163-72. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0195-4. Z Kardiol. 2005. PMID: 15747038
-
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19360877
-
Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)--registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0188-9. Epub 2010 Jul 2. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20596714
-
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022. Am J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18154764 Review.
Cited by
-
Asymptomatic Females Are at Higher Risk for Perioperative TIA/Stroke and Males Are at Higher Risk for Long-Term Mortality after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.Int J Angiol. 2020 Sep 16;33(1):36-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712506. eCollection 2024 Feb. Int J Angiol. 2020. PMID: 38352638 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36013058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24414075
References
-
- European Carotid MRC Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70‐99%) or with mild (0‐29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1991;337:1235–1243. - PubMed
-
- Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379–1387. - PubMed
-
- Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high‐grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453. - PubMed
-
- Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–1428. - PubMed
-
- Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The CASANOVA Study Group. Stroke. 1991;22:1229–1235. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources