Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-11.
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists

Hyun Woo Goo  1
Affiliations
Review

CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists

Hyun Woo Goo. Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

In keeping with the increasing utilization of CT examinations, the greater concern about radiation hazards from examinations has been addressed. In this regard, CT radiation dose optimization has been given a great deal of attention by radiologists, referring physicians, technologists, and physicists. Dose-saving strategies are continuously evolving in terms of imaging techniques as well as dose management. Consequently, regular updates of this issue are necessary especially for radiologists who play a pivotal role in this activity. This review article will provide an update on how we can optimize CT dose in order to maximize the benefit-to-risk ratio of this clinically useful diagnostic imaging method.

Keywords: CT radiation dose; Low dose CT; MDCT; Radiation dose reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Axial contrast-enhanced chest CT images using dual-source CT system with different energy levels (A: 80 kVp, B: mixed with composition ratio of 0.4, C: 140 kVp with tin filter). Degree of contrast enhancement is higher at 80 kVp (A) than at 140 kVp with tin filter (C) as result of different X-ray linear attenuation coefficients between iodine and water. Images (A, C) reconstructed from single X-ray source appear to be noisier than mixed image (B) because of difference in radiation dose by factor of approximately two.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagram illustrating overbeaming, overranging, and adaptive section collimation technology during spiral scanning.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Volume-rendered cardiac CT images seen from feet. Compared with image using standard reconstruction algorithm (A), image using conventional noise-reducing reconstruction filter (B) shows degraded anatomic details of small peripheral pulmonary vessels.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graph showing difference in radiation dose between peak dose and CT dose index (modified from reference [60]). Dose from CT scanning without table increment is overestimated by factor of two or more with CT dose index (CTDI) values in comparison with point dose values.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE. Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:994–1008. - PubMed
    1. Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11:4–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1510–1517. - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284. - PubMed
    1. Mettler FA, Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–531. - PubMed