Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 1;4(3):352-369.
doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x.

How Work-Family Research Can Finally Have an Impact in Organizations

Affiliations

How Work-Family Research Can Finally Have an Impact in Organizations

Ellen Ernst Kossek et al. Ind Organ Psychol. .

Abstract

Although work-family research has mushroomed over the past several decades, an implementation gap persists in putting work-family research into practice. Because of this, work-family researchers have not made a significant impact in improving the lives of employees relative to the amount of research that has been conducted. The goal of this article is to clarify areas where implementation gaps between work-family research and practice are prevalent, discuss the importance of reducing these gaps, and make the case that both better and different research should be conducted. We recommend several alternative but complementary actions for the work-family researcher: (a) work with organizations to study their policy and practice implementation efforts, (b) focus on the impact of rapid technological advances that are blurring work-family boundaries, (c) conduct research to empower the individual to self-manage the work-family interface, and (d) engage in advocacy and collaborative policy research to change institutional contexts and break down silos. Increased partnerships between industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers from many industries and disciplines could break down silos that we see as limiting development of the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allen T, Herst D, Bruck C, Sutton M. Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2000;5:278–308. - PubMed
    1. Allen TD. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2001;58:414–435.
    1. Aumann K, Galinsky E. The state of health in the American workforce: Does having an effective workplace matter? New York, NY: Families and Work Institute; 2009.
    1. Baltes BB, Briggs TE, Huff JW, Wright JA, Neuman GA. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1999;84:496–513.
    1. Baltes BB, Heydens-Gahir HA. Reduction of work–family conflict through the use of selection, optimization, and compensation behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:1005–1018. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources