Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Feb;75(2):236-41.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.017.

Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study

Babac Vahabzadeh et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Prague C & M criteria, developed for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus (BE), (C = circumferential length, M = maximal length) were previously validated among a panel of 29 expert endoscopists with a special interest in BE. Its performance among gastroenterology trainees is unknown.

Objective: To test interobserver agreement among gastroenterology trainees for the Prague C & M criteria, identification of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the diaphragmatic hiatus.

Design: A prospective study.

Setting: Two tertiary referral centers.

Patients and interventions: Standardized endoscopic videos were used.

Main outcome measurements: Interobserver agreement.

Results: Eighteen high-quality videos (normal esophagus, short and long lengths of BE, equally distributed) were independently evaluated by 18 gastroenterology trainees (year 1, n = 5; year 2, n = 6; year 3, n = 7) after administration of a formal teaching module by an expert endoscopist. Overall intraclass correlation coefficients for assessment of the C and M extent of the endoscopic BE segment above the GEJ were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98), respectively. The overall intraclass correlation coefficients for GEJ and diaphragmatic hiatus location recognition were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.90 (0.82-0.95), respectively. The year of training did not affect interobserver agreement.

Limitations: The use of videos for endoscopic evaluation.

Conclusion: After standardized teaching, the Prague C & M criteria have high overall validity among gastroenterology trainees irrespective of the level of training for endoscopic evaluation of visualized BE lengths as well as key endoscopic landmarks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic view of Barrett's esophagus showing C: extent of circumferential metaplasia and M: maximal extent of metaplasia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case report form (CRF) used by assessors for analysis of endoscopic videos

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharma P. Clinical Practice. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(26):2548–56. - PubMed
    1. Westhoff B, Brotze S, Weston A, et al. The frequency of Barrett's esophagus in high-risk patients with chronic GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:226–31. - PubMed
    1. Pondugula K, Wani S, Sharma P. Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in adults: long-term GERD or something else? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007;9(6):468–474. - PubMed
    1. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(11):825–831. - PubMed
    1. Solaymani-Dodaran M, Logan RFA, West J, et al. Risk of oesophageal cancer in Barrett's oesophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 2004;53(8):1070–1074. - PMC - PubMed