Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study
- PMID: 22248595
- PMCID: PMC4547779
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.017
Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study
Abstract
Background: The Prague C & M criteria, developed for the endoscopic grading of Barrett's esophagus (BE), (C = circumferential length, M = maximal length) were previously validated among a panel of 29 expert endoscopists with a special interest in BE. Its performance among gastroenterology trainees is unknown.
Objective: To test interobserver agreement among gastroenterology trainees for the Prague C & M criteria, identification of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the diaphragmatic hiatus.
Design: A prospective study.
Setting: Two tertiary referral centers.
Patients and interventions: Standardized endoscopic videos were used.
Main outcome measurements: Interobserver agreement.
Results: Eighteen high-quality videos (normal esophagus, short and long lengths of BE, equally distributed) were independently evaluated by 18 gastroenterology trainees (year 1, n = 5; year 2, n = 6; year 3, n = 7) after administration of a formal teaching module by an expert endoscopist. Overall intraclass correlation coefficients for assessment of the C and M extent of the endoscopic BE segment above the GEJ were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98), respectively. The overall intraclass correlation coefficients for GEJ and diaphragmatic hiatus location recognition were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.90 (0.82-0.95), respectively. The year of training did not affect interobserver agreement.
Limitations: The use of videos for endoscopic evaluation.
Conclusion: After standardized teaching, the Prague C & M criteria have high overall validity among gastroenterology trainees irrespective of the level of training for endoscopic evaluation of visualized BE lengths as well as key endoscopic landmarks.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Interobserver reliability in the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of Barrett's esophagus: an Asian multinational study.Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):699-704. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255629. Epub 2010 Aug 30. Endoscopy. 2010. PMID: 20806154 Free PMC article.
-
The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria.Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov;131(5):1392-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.032. Epub 2006 Aug 16. Gastroenterology. 2006. PMID: 17101315
-
Validation of the Prague C&M classification of Barrett's esophagus in clinical practice.Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):876-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344952. Epub 2013 Oct 28. Endoscopy. 2013. PMID: 24165812
-
Diagnosis and Management of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association.Gastroenterology. 2016 Nov;151(5):822-835. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.040. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27702561 Review.
-
Endoscopic definition of esophagogastric junction for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus: importance of systematic education and training.Dig Endosc. 2009 Oct;21(4):213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00895.x. Dig Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19961518 Review.
Cited by
-
Usefulness of Endoscopy for the Detection and Diagnosis of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Diseases Relating to Abnormal Esophageal Motility.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 12;13(4):695. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040695. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36832183 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Carcinogenesis of Barrett's esophagus: a review of the clinical literature.Clin J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;6(6):399-414. doi: 10.1007/s12328-013-0412-z. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 26182128
-
Adjunctive Use of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling-3D in Patients With Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Increases Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Dysplasia.Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):1990-2001. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002818. Epub 2024 Apr 18. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38635377 Free PMC article.
-
Evolving management of metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's epithelium.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec 21;22(47):10316-10324. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10316. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 28058012 Free PMC article. Review.
-
BOB CAT: A Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett's Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):662-82; quiz 683. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.55. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25869390 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sharma P. Clinical Practice. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(26):2548–56. - PubMed
-
- Westhoff B, Brotze S, Weston A, et al. The frequency of Barrett's esophagus in high-risk patients with chronic GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:226–31. - PubMed
-
- Pondugula K, Wani S, Sharma P. Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in adults: long-term GERD or something else? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007;9(6):468–474. - PubMed
-
- Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(11):825–831. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources