Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology
- PMID: 22249304
- PMCID: PMC3725734
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182372fd8
Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology
Abstract
Background: The excellent sensitivity and specificity of commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for the identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae have been demonstrated. This study evaluated the performance of the BD ProbeTec™ N. gonorrhoeae Q (GCQ) Amplified DNA Assay on the BD Viper™ System with XTR™ Technology in a multicenter study.
Methods: Specimens were collected at 7 geographically diverse clinical sites from 1846 women and men attending sexually transmitted disease, family planning, and obstetrics and gynecology clinics. There were 1768 evaluable participants, 994 women and 774 men. GCQ results from female endocervical, self-collected vaginal, male urethral swab specimens, and male and female neat (unpreserved) urine specimens, as well as those obtained using the urine preservative transport (UPT) tube for the GCQ assay were compared with patient infected status (PIS). For each participant, PIS was determined based on the combined results from the reference assays Aptima Combo 2® (AC2) and BD ProbeTec™ ET GC Amplified DNA Assay (PT).
Results: The sensitivity versus PIS for endocervical, vaginal, and female UPT urine, and female neat urine samples was 98.5%, 100.0%, 98.5%, and 96.9%, respectively; the specificity was 99.7%, 99.1%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively. The sensitivity versus PIS for male urethral swabs and both male UPT and neat urine was 100.0%, with specificities of 99.1% for the urethral swab and UPT urine and 98.9% for the neat urine. The overall GCQ assay performance was not statistically different from that of AC2 or PT.
Conclusions: The GCQ assay demonstrated performance characteristics comparable with other commercially available nucleic acid-based tests such as AC2 and PT. Vaginal swabs, endocervical swabs, urethral swabs, and urine specimens may all be used for gonorrhea screening.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Chlamydia trachomatis Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology.Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jul;38(7):603-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31820a94d2. Sex Transm Dis. 2011. PMID: 21301389 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections.Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Dec;32(12):725-8. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000190092.59482.96. Sex Transm Dis. 2005. PMID: 16314767
-
Evaluation of the Roche cobas® CT/NG test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in male urine.Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Jul;39(7):543-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31824e26ff. Sex Transm Dis. 2012. PMID: 22706217
-
Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):1008-16. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1008-1016.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11230419 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e022510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022510. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30659036 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Point of care diagnostics for sexually transmitted infections: perspectives and advances.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jun;12(6):657-72. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.880651. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014. PMID: 24484215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types.J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec 28;55(1):155-164. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01766-16. Print 2017 Jan. J Clin Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27795343 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous real-time PCR detection of nine prevalent sexually transmitted infections using a predesigned double-quenched TaqMan probe panel.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282439. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36877694 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis: A Meta-Analysis.Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):172-179. doi: 10.1370/afm.2942. Ann Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 36973065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
German evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the management of penile urethritis.J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2025 Feb;23(2):254-275. doi: 10.1111/ddg.15617. Epub 2025 Jan 17. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2025. PMID: 39822084 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2009. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
-
- Hsieh YH, Howell MR, Gaydos JC, et al. Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administered vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:769–773. - PubMed
-
- Chernesky MA, Hook EW, Martin DH, et al. Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infectitons. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:729–733. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous