Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft
- PMID: 22249627
- DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2011.216
Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate morbidity associated with the radial forearm free flap donor site and to compare functional and aesthetic outcomes of ulnar-based transposition flap (UBTF) vs split-thickness skin graft (STSG) closure of the donor site.
Design: Case-control study.
Setting: Tertiary care institution.
Patients: The inclusion criteria were flap size not exceeding 30 cm(2), patient availability for a single follow-up visit, and performance of surgery at least 6 months previously. Forty-four patients were included in the study and were reviewed. Twenty-two patients had UBTF closure, and 22 had STSG closure.
Main outcome measures: Variables analyzed included wrist mobility, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores, pinch and grip strength (using a dynamometer), and hand sensitivity (using monofilament testing over the radial nerve distribution). In analyses of operated arms vs nonoperated arms, variables obtained only for the operated arms included Vancouver Scar Scale scores and visual analog scale scores for Aesthetics and Overall Arm Function.
Results: The mean (SD) wrist extension was significantly better in the UBTF group (56.0° [10.4°] for nonoperated arms and 62.0° [9.7°] for operated arms) than in the STSG group (59.0° [7.1°] for nonoperated arms and 58.4° [12.1°] for operated arms) (P = .02). The improvement in wrist range of motion for the UBTF group approached statistical significance (P = .07). All other variables (Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores, pinch and grip strength, hand sensitivity, and visual analog scale scores) were significantly better for nonoperated arms vs operated arms, but no significant differences were observed between the UBTF and STSG groups.
Conclusions: The radial forearm free flap donor site carries significant morbidity. Donor site UBTF closure was associated with improved wrist extension and represents an alternative method of closure for small donor site defects.
Similar articles
-
Radial forearm free flap donor site outcomes comparison by closure methods.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Feb;134(2):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.09.019. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006. PMID: 16455382
-
Aesthetic and functional results of harvesting radial forearm flap, especially with regard to hand function.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Feb;30(1):42-8. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0005. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11289620
-
AlloDerm with split-thickness skin graft for coverage of the forearm free flap donor site.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan;150(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/0194599813513713. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 24270163
-
Reconstruction of the hand with forearm island flaps.Clin Plast Surg. 1997 Jan;24(1):33-48. Clin Plast Surg. 1997. PMID: 9211026 Review.
-
Is there an ideal way to close the donor site of radial forearm free flaps?Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;56(6):444-452. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 30. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29859780 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Functional Recovery and Subjective Donor-Site Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Flap Reconstruction in Small- to Moderate-Sized Palatal Defects.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020 Mar;13(1):71-77. doi: 10.1177/1943387520904879. Epub 2020 Mar 16. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020. PMID: 32642035 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of fingertip defect with reverse digital artery island flap and repair of donor site with digital dorsal advancement flap.Front Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10:1127356. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1127356. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37123544 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of volar defects of the finger using dorsal digital-metacarpal flap versus free medial plantar artery flap: a comparative study.BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00994-3. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33482785 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Dec;15(4):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5. Epub 2015 Apr 19. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016. PMID: 27833334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A biodegradable polyurethane dermal matrix in reconstruction of free flap donor sites: a pilot study.Eplasty. 2015 Apr 24;15:e13. eCollection 2015. Eplasty. 2015. PMID: 25987938 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
