[Transarterial ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Status and developments]
- PMID: 22249701
- DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2211-1
[Transarterial ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Status and developments]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and represents the main cause of death among European patients with liver cirrhosis. Only 30-40% of patients diagnosed with HCC are candidates for curative treatment options (e.g. surgical resection, liver transplantation or ablation). The remaining majority of patients must undergo local regional and palliative therapies. Transvascular ablation of HCC takes advantage of the fact that the hypervascularized HCC receives most of its blood supply from the hepatic artery. In this context transvascular ablation describes different therapy regimens which can be assigned to four groups: cTACE (conventional transarterial chemoembolization), bland embolization (transarterial embolization TAE), DEB-TACE (TACE with drug-eluting beads, DEB) and SIRT (selective internal radiation therapy, radioembolization). Conventional TACE is the most common type of transvascular ablation and represents a combination of intra-arterial chemotherapy and embolization with occlusion of the arterial blood supply. However, there is no standardized regimen with respect to the chemotherapeutic drug, the embolic agent, the usage of lipiodol and the interval between the TACE procedures. Even the exact course of a cTACE procedure (order of chemotherapy or embolization) is not standardized. It remains unclear whether or not intra-arterial chemotherapy is definitely required as bland embolization using very small, tightly calibrated spherical particles (without intra-arterial administration of a chemotherapeutic drug) shows tumor necrosis comparable to cTACE. For DEB-TACE microparticles loaded with a chemotherapeutic drug combine the advantages of cTACE and bland embolization. Thereby, a continuing chemotherapeutic effect within the tumor might cause a further increase in intratumoral cytotoxicity and at the same time a decrease in systemic toxicity.
Similar articles
-
Transvascular therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), status and developments.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018 Apr;27(2):69-80. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1432489. Epub 2018 Jan 30. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018. PMID: 29381102 Review.
-
New concepts in embolotherapy of HCC.Med Oncol. 2017 Apr;34(4):58. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-0917-2. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Med Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28299645 Review.
-
Transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (TRACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-144. Trials. 2012. PMID: 22913492 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The cost-effectiveness of TheraSphere in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are eligible for transarterial embolization.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.027. Epub 2020 Sep 14. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32958370
-
Recent advances in transarterial embolotherapies in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;23(4):265-272. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0111. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 29113030 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of neo-adjuvant Sorafenib treatment on liver transplantation in HCC patients - a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial.BMC Cancer. 2015 May 11;15:392. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1373-z. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25957784 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous