Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012;17(2):192-200.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0268. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

Neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: the emerging paradigm?

Affiliations
Review

Neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: the emerging paradigm?

Kian-Huat Lim et al. Oncologist. 2012.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers due to difficulty in early diagnosis and its high resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. It is now clear that even patients with potentially resectable disease require multimodality treatment including chemotherapy and/or radiation to improve resectability and reduce recurrence. Tremendous efforts are currently being invested in refining preoperative staging to identify optimal surgical candidates, and also in developing various neoadjuvant or adjuvant regimens to improve surgical outcome. Although at present no studies have been done to directly compare the benefit of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches, accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach is probably beneficial for a subset of the patient population, particularly those with borderline resectable disease in which complete surgical resection is almost certainly unachievable. In this article, we review the literature and rationales of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation, as well as their potential limitations and caveats. We also review the pathological findings following neoadjuvant therapies, and potential surgical complications that may be associated with neoadjuvant therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Kian-Huat Lim: None; Eugene Chung: None; Adeel Khan: None; Dengfeng Cao: None; David Linehan: Novartis Oncology, Pfizer (RF); Edgar Ben-Josef: None; Andrea Wang-Gillam: None

Section Editors: Richard Goldberg: Genomic Health, Lilly (C/A); Myriad, Enzon (RF); Amgen, Bayer, Genentech, sanofi-aventis, (C/A, RF); Patrick Johnston: Almac Diagnostics (E); 12 patents (IP); Roche, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, sanofi-aventis (C/A, H); AstraZeneca (H, RF); Pfizer (H); Amgen (RF); Almac Diagnostics (C/A, OI); Fusion Antibodies (OI); Peter O'Dwyer: Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals (C/A, OI); PrECOG, Topotarget (C/A); Methylgene, Novartis, Ardea, Exelixis, FibroGen, Incyte, ArQule, GlaxoSmithKline (RF); AstraZeneca (C/A, RF); Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech (RF, H).

Reviewers “A,” “B,” and “C”: None.

References

    1. Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2011.
    1. Griffin JF, Smalley SR, Jewell W, et al. Patterns of failure after curative resection of pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1990;66:56–61. - PubMed
    1. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:567–579. - PubMed
    1. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–277. - PubMed
    1. Neuhaus P, Riess H, Post S, et al. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (CAO/AIO). CONKO-001: Final results of the randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus observation in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (PC) J Clin Oncol. 2008;26 abstr LBA4504.