Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:5416-9.
doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091339.

Electrical performance of penetrating microelectrodes chronically implanted in cat cortex

Affiliations

Electrical performance of penetrating microelectrodes chronically implanted in cat cortex

Sheryl R Kane et al. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011.

Abstract

Penetrating multielectrode arrays with electrode coatings of sputtered iridium oxide (SIROF) have been implanted chronically in cat cortex for periods over 300 days. The ability of these electrodes to inject charge at levels above expected thresholds for neural excitation has been examined in vivo by measurements of voltage transients in response to current-controlled, cathodal stimulation pulsing. The effect of current pulse width from 150 μs to 500 μs and voltage biasing of the electrodes in the interpulse period at two levels, 0.0 V and 0.6 V vs. Ag|AgCl, were also investigated. The results of in vivo characterization of the electrodes by open-circuit potential measurements, cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy are also reported.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scanning electron micrograph of a 16-shaft penetrating microelectrode array with a 400 μm spacing between electrode tips
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Representative cyclic voltammograms from a SIROF-coated microelectrode in vitro and after 32, 117, and 168 days in vivo.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Averaged CV response for five electrodes on one array in model-ISF prior to implantation and after 194 days in vivo. Sweep rate 50 mV/s.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cathodal charge storage capacity measured at 50 mV/s averaged over the total number of implanted electrodes studies as a function of time. Error bars are standard deviations.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the average CV response of six electrodes pre-implantation in model-ISF and after 194 days in vivo. Sweep rate 50,000 mV/s.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
A representative example of the change in electrode impedance over the course of 168 days implantation. The pre-implantation, in vitro impedance is shown for comparison. The arrow indicates the direction of impedance change with implantation time.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Mean impedance magnitude at 1 kHz averaged over the total number of implanted electrodes studies as a function of time. Error bars are standard deviations.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Voltage transients for 12 electrodes on one array pulsed cathodally at 8 nC/ph (400 μs pulse width, 20 μA current, 50 Hz) corresponding to a nominal charge-injection density of 400 μC/cm2. The measurements were made 194 days post-implantation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cogan SF, “Neural Stimulation and recording electrodes,” Annu Rev Biomed Eng. vol 10, pp 275–309, 2008. - PubMed
    1. Merrill DR, Bikson M, and Jefferys JGR, “Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols,” J. Neurosci. Methods vol. 14, pp. 171–198, 2005. - PubMed
    1. Rousche PJ, and Normann RA, “Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 82, pp. 1–15, 1998. - PubMed
    1. Branner A, Stein RB, and Normann RA, “Selective stimulation of cat sciatic nerve using an array of varying length microelectrodes,” J. Neurophysiology, vol. 85, pp. 1585–1594, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Cogan SF, Ehrlich J, Plante TD, andVan Wagenen R, “Penetrating microelectrode arrays with low-impedance sputtered iridium oxide electrode coatings,” Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc., 7147–50, 2009, - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources