Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Apr;15(4):365-377.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity

Affiliations
Review

Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity

Céline Bellard et al. Ecol Lett. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Many studies in recent years have investigated the effects of climate change on the future of biodiversity. In this review, we first examine the different possible effects of climate change that can operate at individual, population, species, community, ecosystem and biome scales, notably showing that species can respond to climate change challenges by shifting their climatic niche along three non-exclusive axes: time (e.g. phenology), space (e.g. range) and self (e.g. physiology). Then, we present the principal specificities and caveats of the most common approaches used to estimate future biodiversity at global and sub-continental scales and we synthesise their results. Finally, we highlight several challenges for future research both in theoretical and applied realms. Overall, our review shows that current estimates are very variable, depending on the method, taxonomic group, biodiversity loss metrics, spatial scales and time periods considered. Yet, the majority of models indicate alarming consequences for biodiversity, with the worst-case scenarios leading to extinction rates that would qualify as the sixth mass extinction in the history of the earth.

Keywords: Biodiversity; climate change; species extinctions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of some of the predicted aspects of climate change and some examples of their likely effects on different levels of biodiversity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The three directions of responses to climate change through phenotypic plasticity or evolutionary responses : moving in space (dispersing to areas with suitable habitat or changing location on a microhabitat scale), shifting life history traits in time (adjusting life cycle events to match the new climatic conditions, including phenology and diurnal rhythms), or changing life history traits in its physiology to cope with new climatic conditions. Species can cope with climate change by shifting along one or several of these three axes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples on successive combinations of socio-economic scenarios, projections of extinction drivers, habitat or species range models and extinction models and biodiversity metrics, leading to projections of biodiversity losses following climate change. Numbers correspond to references (see Appendix S2 for details and reference list).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Projections of loss of biodiversity due to climate change, for different taxonomic, temporal and spatial scales. The width of the box illustrates three levels of generality: global scale and several taxonomic groups (formula image), global scale and only one taxonomic group, continental scale and only one taxonomic group. The box is delimited by the upper and lower boundaries of the intermediate scenario, while maximum and minimum values of the whiskers indicate the highest and lowest biodiversity losses across all projections. This figure illustrates that the different studies (i) generally predict significant biodiversity loss and (ii) use a combination of different biodiversity metrics, taxonomic groups and spatial scale and time horizon, making generalisations difficult. Numbers correspond to references (see Appendix S2 for details and references).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Issues and challenges for climate change driven biodiversity loss. Examples of each are presented and discussed in the main text. The issues are in the first box, which represents the main factors of uncertainty and the direction of the likely current bias (green factors and arrow down is a likely overestimation, while red factors and arrow up is a likely underestimation; both can occur simultaneously, according to the approach taken in different studies; black factors and question marks are for unknown direction of mis-estimation; double arrow means very large expected effect). Challenge types range from quantitative (such as increasing the number of studies and the quantity of available data, or extend the focus of studies to include more factors) to more qualitative ones (developing new tools and progressing in resolving complexity).

References

    1. Akcçakaya H, Butchart SHM, Mace GM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C. Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity. Global Change Biology. 2006;12:2037–2043.
    1. Alkemade R, van Oorschot M, Miles L, Nellemann C, Bakkenes M, ten Brink B. GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss. Ecosystems. 2009;12:374–390.
    1. Alo CA, Wang GL. Potential future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on climate projections by eight general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences. 2008;113:16.
    1. Anderson BJ, Akcakaya HR, Araujo MB, Fordham DA, Martinez-Meyer E, Thuiller W, Brook BW. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2009;276:1415–1420. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Araùjo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogues-Bravo D, Thuiller W. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters. 2011;14:484–492. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types