Psychoactive substances and the political ecology of mental distress
- PMID: 22257499
- PMCID: PMC3278374
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-4
Psychoactive substances and the political ecology of mental distress
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to both understand and depathologize clinically significant mental distress related to criminalized contact with psychoactive biotic substances by employing a framework known as critical political ecology of health and disease from the subdiscipline of medical geography. The political ecology of disease framework joins disease ecology with the power-calculus of political economy and calls for situating health-related phenomena in their broad social and economic context, demonstrating how large-scale global processes are at work at the local level, and giving due attention to historical analysis in understanding the relevant human-environment relations. Critical approaches to the political ecology of health and disease have the potential to incorporate ever-broadening social, political, economic, and cultural factors to challenge traditional causes, definitions, and sociomedical understandings of disease. Inspired by the patient-centered medical diagnosis critiques in medical geography, this paper will use a critical political ecology of disease approach to challenge certain prevailing sociomedical interpretations of disease, or more specifically, mental disorder, found in the field of substance abuse diagnostics and the related American punitive public policy regimes of substance abuse prevention and control, with regards to the use of biotic substances. It will do this by first critically interrogating the concept of "substances" and grounding them in an ecological context, reviewing the history of both the development of modern substance control laws and modern substance abuse diagnostics, and understanding the biogeographic dimensions of such approaches. It closes with proposing a non-criminalizing public health approach for regulating human close contact with psychoactive substances using the example of cannabis use.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Breathless in houston: a political ecology of health approach to understanding environmental health concerns.Med Anthropol. 2004 Oct-Dec;23(4):295-326. doi: 10.1080/01459740490513521. Med Anthropol. 2004. PMID: 15545091
-
[Political ecology, ecological economics, and public health: interfaces for the sustainability of development and health promotion].Cad Saude Publica. 2007;23 Suppl 4:S503-12. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001600011. Cad Saude Publica. 2007. PMID: 18038032 Portuguese.
-
The refugee crisis in Africa and implications for health and disease: a political ecology approach.Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(12):1637-53. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)10129-0. Soc Sci Med. 1998. PMID: 9672401
-
Towards an integrated theoretical framework for understanding water insecurity and gender-based violence in Low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102651. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102651. Epub 2021 Aug 10. Health Place. 2021. PMID: 34388581 Review.
-
The Political Economy of the Mental Health System: A Marxist Analysis.Front Sociol. 2022 Jan 17;6:771875. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.771875. eCollection 2021. Front Sociol. 2022. PMID: 35242843 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
'Tis in our nature: taking the human-cannabis relationship seriously in health science and public policy.Front Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 26;4:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00006. eCollection 2013. Front Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23447745 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Musto DF. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. First published in 1973. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
-
- Helmer J. Drugs and Minority Oppression. New York: Seabury Press; 1975.
-
- Becker H. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press; 1963.
-
- DeGrandpre RJ. The Cult of Pharmacology: How America Became the World's Most Troubled Drug Culture. Durham: Duke University Press; 2006.
-
- Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) 1994 and DSM-IV-TR (text revision) Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources