Differences in affiliative behavior, pair bonding, and vaginal cytology in two species of vole (Microtus ochrogaster and M. montanus)
- PMID: 2225765
- DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.3.268
Differences in affiliative behavior, pair bonding, and vaginal cytology in two species of vole (Microtus ochrogaster and M. montanus)
Abstract
Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and montane voles (M. montanus) display marked differences in social organization in the field. Trios of 1 male and 2 females were studied in a large enclosure for a 10-day period. Prairie voles spent 59% of the observation time in side-by-side contact, whereas montane voles spent only 7% of the time in contact. Vaginal smears indicated female-female suppression of estrus in prairie voles; female montane voles appeared to cycle in the presence of males. Male prairie voles preferentially paired and nested with 1 of the females, and vaginal estrus generally followed pair formation by 2 days. Male montane voles did not spend time preferentially with either female, even after mating. These results suggest that the contrasting mating systems of these species result from differences in the propensity for affiliative behavior and social bonding rather than from mate availability or female receptivity.
Similar articles
-
Estrus induction in four species of voles (Microtus).J Comp Psychol. 1992 Dec;106(4):366-73. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.366. J Comp Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1451419
-
Infant's response to social separation reflects adult differences in affiliative behavior: a comparative developmental study in prairie and montane voles.Dev Psychobiol. 1990 Jul;23(5):375-93. doi: 10.1002/dev.420230502. Dev Psychobiol. 1990. PMID: 2253816
-
The effects of mate removal on pregnancy success in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).Biol Reprod. 1992 Jul;47(1):37-42. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod47.1.37. Biol Reprod. 1992. PMID: 1637945
-
Control of ovulation, vaginal estrus, and behavioral receptivity in voles (Microtus).Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985 Winter;9(4):563-71. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90003-x. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985. PMID: 3909015 Review.
-
The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster): an animal model for behavioral neuroendocrine research on pair bonding.ILAR J. 2004;45(1):35-45. doi: 10.1093/ilar.45.1.35. ILAR J. 2004. PMID: 14752206 Review.
Cited by
-
Lateral septum DREADD activation alters male prairie vole prosocial and antisocial behaviors, not partner preferences.Commun Biol. 2022 Nov 26;5(1):1299. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04274-z. Commun Biol. 2022. PMID: 36435943 Free PMC article.
-
Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5981-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5981. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992. PMID: 1321430 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanistic substrates of a life history transition in male prairie voles: Developmental plasticity in affiliation and aggression corresponds to nonapeptide neuronal function.Horm Behav. 2018 Mar;99:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Horm Behav. 2018. PMID: 29407458 Free PMC article.
-
The Monogamy Paradox: What Do Love and Sex Have to Do With It?Front Ecol Evol. 2018;6:202. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00202. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Front Ecol Evol. 2018. PMID: 31840025 Free PMC article.
-
Brain functional networks associated with social bonding in monogamous voles.Elife. 2021 Jan 14;10:e55081. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55081. Elife. 2021. PMID: 33443015 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources