Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Apr;5(2):107-16.
doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9344-5. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Left bundle branch block, an old-new entity

Affiliations
Review

Left bundle branch block, an old-new entity

Günter Breithardt et al. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is generally associated with a poorer prognosis in comparison to normal intraventricular conduction, but also in comparison to right bundle branch block which is generally considered to be benign in the absence of an underlying cardiac disorder like congenital heart disease. LBBB may be the first manifestation of a more diffuse myocardial disease. The typical surface ECG feature of LBBB is a prolongation of QRS above 0.11 s in combination with a delay of the intrinsic deflection in leads V5 and V6 of more than 60 ms and no septal q waves in leads I, V5, and V6 due to the abnormal septal activation from right to left. LBBB may induce abnormalities in left ventricular performance due to abnormal asynchronous contraction patterns which can be compensated by biventricular pacing (resynchronization therapy). Asynchronous electrical activation of the ventricles causes regional differences in workload which may lead to asymmetric hypertrophy and left ventricular dilatation, especially due to increased wall mass in late-activated regions, which may aggravate preexisting left ventricular pumping performance or even induce it. Of special interest are patients with LBBB and normal left ventricular dimensions and normal ejection fraction at rest but who may present with an abnormal increase in pulmonary artery pressure during exercise, production of lactate during high-rate pacing, signs of ischemia on myocardial scintigrams (but no coronary artery narrowing), and abnormal ultrastructural findings on myocardial biopsy. For this entity, the term latent cardiomyopathy had been suggested previously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of classical left bundle branch block in a patient with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy

References

    1. Breithardt G, Kuhn H, Hammel D, Scheld HH, Seipel L, Böcker D. Cardiac resynchronization therapy into the next decade: From the past to morbidity/mortality trials. European Heart Journal Supplements. 2002;4(Suppl D):D 102–D 110.
    1. Bakker PFA, Meijburg H, de Jonge N, van Mechelen R, Wittkamp F, Mower M, et al. Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology. 1994;17(4):820.
    1. Cazeau S, Ritter P, Bakdach S, Lazarus A, Limousin M, Henao L, et al. Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology. 1994;17(11 Pt 2):1974–1979. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03783.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(21):2140–2150. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(15):1539–1549. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms