Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Apr;50(4):1195-8.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.05592-11. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Effects of decontamination, DNA extraction, and amplification procedures on the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of decontamination, DNA extraction, and amplification procedures on the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer)

Dissou Affolabi et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

We compared two DNA extraction methods (a semiautomated method using a Maxwell kit and a modified Boom method) and three amplification procedures (a single-step PCR, a nested PCR, and a real-time quantitative PCR) on 74 surgical tissue specimens from patients with clinically suspected Buruli ulcer. All of these procedures were compared before and after decontamination. We observed that, among the procedures tested, real-time PCR after the modified Boom extraction method or a single-run PCR assay after the Maxwell 16 extraction method, performed on nondecontaminated suspensions, are the best for the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Summary of procedures used.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Distribution of specimens positive with at least one procedure before decontamination (n = 55).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Quantification of bacillary load by direct-smear examination versus quantitative real-time PCR for the 50 specimens positive by real-time PCR before decontamination. The values of all specimens are plotted with the average cycle threshold (CT) value per acid-fast bacillus (AFB).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Distribution of specimens positive with at least one procedure after decontamination (n = 46).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Affolabi D. 2009. Development of simple and inexpensive tools for the control of mycobacterial diseases in a low-resource country. Ph.D. dissertation University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    1. American Thoracic Society 1981. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 123:343–358 - PubMed
    1. Beissner M, Herbinger KH, Bretzel G. 2010. Laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease. Future Microbiol. 5:363–370 - PubMed
    1. Debacker M, et al. 2004. Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer) in rural hospital, southern Benin, 1997–2001. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:1391–1398 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durnez L, et al. 2009. A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens. J. Microbiol. Methods 76:152–158 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources