Why are some evidence-based care recommendations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease better implemented than others? Perspectives of medical practitioners
- PMID: 22259242
- PMCID: PMC3257951
- DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S26581
Why are some evidence-based care recommendations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease better implemented than others? Perspectives of medical practitioners
Abstract
Background: Clinical guidelines for management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include recommendations based on high levels of evidence, but gaps exist in their implementation. The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives of medical practitioners regarding implementation of six high-evidence recommendations for the management of people with COPD.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical practitioners involved with care of COPD patients in hospital and general practice. Interviews sought medical practitioners' experience regarding implementation of smoking cessation, influenza vaccination, pulmonary rehabilitation, guideline-based medications, long-term oxygen therapy for hypoxemia and plan and advice for future exacerbations. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Nine hospital-based medical practitioners and seven general practitioners participated. Four major categories were identified which impacted on implementation of the target recommendations in the care of patients with COPD: (1) role clarity of the medical practitioner; (2) persuasive communication with the patient; (3) complexity of behavioral change required; (4) awareness and support available at multiple levels. For some recommendations, strength in all four categories provided significant enablers supporting implementation. However, with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation and plans and advice for future exacerbations, all identified categories that presented barriers to implementation.
Conclusion: This study of medical practitioner perspectives has indicated areas where significant barriers to the implementation of key evidence-based recommendations in COPD management persist. Developing strategies to target the identified categories provides an opportunity to achieve greater implementation of those high-evidence recommendations in the care of people with COPD.
Keywords: barriers; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; enablers; guideline implementation; medical practitioners; qualitative research.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care recommendations have low implementation and why? A pilot study.BMC Res Notes. 2012 Nov 23;5:652. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-652. BMC Res Notes. 2012. PMID: 23176312 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy to improve the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a study protocol of a cluster randomized trial.Trials. 2014 Apr 4;15:109. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-109. Trials. 2014. PMID: 24708623 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
General practitioners' perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 17;11:1929-37. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S108611. eCollection 2016. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016. PMID: 27574417 Free PMC article.
-
Review: clinical inertia in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.COPD. 2012 Feb;9(1):73-80. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.631957. COPD. 2012. PMID: 22292599 Review.
-
Specialty COPD care during COVID-19: patient and clinician perspectives on remote delivery.BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Jan;8(1):e000817. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000817. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021. PMID: 33414261 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Referral of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers for primary healthcare practitioners.Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):e274-e284. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708101. Print 2020 Apr. Br J Gen Pract. 2020. PMID: 31988083 Free PMC article.
-
Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 21;13:530. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-530. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. PMID: 24359085 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitators and barriers to the self-management of COPD: a qualitative study from rural Nepal.BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e035700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035700. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32156769 Free PMC article.
-
Rehabilitation of Discharged Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Are New Strategies Needed?Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 12;4:2333392816687704. doi: 10.1177/2333392816687704. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28508012 Free PMC article.
-
The feasibility of an innovative GP-physiotherapist partnership to identify and manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (INTEGRATED): study protocol.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 23;6:138. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00680-4. eCollection 2020. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020. PMID: 32983555 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Access Economics Pty Ltd. Economic impact of COPD cost effective solutions. 2008. [Accessed November 28, 2011]. Available from: http://www.lungfoundation.com.au/images/stories/docs/copd/2008_alf_acces....
-
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD. 2010. [Accessed August 16, 2011]. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLDReport_April112011.pdf.
-
- McKenzie D, Abramson M, Crockett A, et al. New Zealand Guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2010. [Accessed August 16, 2011]. Available from: http://www.copdx.org.au/
-
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) A Guide to the Development, Evaluation and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canberra: HMRC; 1999.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical