Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:8:13.
doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2011.8.13. Epub 2011 Dec 17.

Implementation of a multi-level evaluation strategy: a case study on a program for international medical graduates

Affiliations

Implementation of a multi-level evaluation strategy: a case study on a program for international medical graduates

Debra Nestel et al. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2011.

Abstract

Evaluation of educational interventions is often focused on immediate and/or short-term metrics associated with knowledge and/or skills acquisition. We developed an educational intervention to support international medical graduates working in rural Victoria. We wanted an evaluation strategy that included participants' reactions and considered transfer of learning to the workplace and retention of learning. However, with participants in distributed locations and limited program resources, this was likely to prove challenging. Elsewhere, we have reported the outcomes of this evaluation. In this educational development report, we describe our evaluation strategy as a case study, its underpinning theoretical framework, the strategy, and its benefits and challenges. The strategy sought to address issues of program structure, process, and outcomes. We used a modified version of Kirkpatrick's model as a framework to map our evaluation of participants' experiences, acquisition of knowledge and skills, and their application in the workplace. The predominant benefit was that most of the evaluation instruments allowed for personalization of the program. The baseline instruments provided a broad view of participants' expectations, needs, and current perspective on their role. Immediate evaluation instruments allowed ongoing tailoring of the program to meet learning needs. Intermediate evaluations facilitated insight on the transfer of learning. The principal challenge related to the resource intensive nature of the evaluation strategy. A dedicated program administrator was required to manage data collection. Although resource-intensive, we recommend baseline, immediate, and intermediate data collection points, with multi-source feedback being especially illuminating. We believe our experiences may be valuable to faculty involved in program evaluations.

Keywords: Educational measurement; Medical education; Medical students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Calder J. Programme evaluation and quality: a comprehensive guide to setting up an evaluation system. London: Kogan Page Limited; 1995.
    1. Freeth D, Mammick M, Reeves S, Koppel I, Barr H. Effective interprofessional education: development, delivery and evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005.
    1. Garman K. Eastside, Westside. An exercise in applying document analysis techniques in educational evaluation. Research on evaluation program paper and report series (No. 78) Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.; 1982.
    1. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects and materials. New York: McGraw Hill; 1981.
    1. Mertens D. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2005.

LinkOut - more resources