Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings
- PMID: 22261768
- DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823f6263
Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to optimize and predict the most efficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences; T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1W, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping sequences and proton MR spectroscopy (H-MRS) for the detection of prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: After institutional review board approval and informed consent taken from all the patients, 40 patients with prostate cancer were included in this research. Two readers independently evaluated the results of T1W, T2W, DCE T1W, and DWI-ADC mapping sequences and proton H-MRS for the depiction of prostate cancer. Reference standard was the transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy and the surgical histopathological results. Statistical analysis was assessed by the Fisher exact t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, variance analysis test with kappa (κ) values and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for ADC values, choline (Cho)/citrate (Cit) and Cho+creatine (Cre)/Cit ratios for each observer.
Results: Based on both readers' results, sensitivity declined to 31% and specificity to 75% for the T1W sequence, sensitivity declined to 43% and specificity to 67% for the DCE T1W sequence, sensitivity declined to 46% and specificity to 68% for the T2W sequence, sensitivity declined to 29% and specificity to 82% for the DWI-ADC mapping; and specificity was 49% for the Cho/Cit and Cho+Cre/Cit ratios, sensitivity was 69% for the Cho/Cit ratio, and sensitivity was 70% for the Cho+Cre/Cit ratio for H-MRS. The T2W sequence and H-MRS presented significant statistical differences for the depiction of prostatic cancer (P < 0.05), the most efficient sequence to detect prostatic cancer was H-MRS: Cho+Cre/Cit and Cho/Cit ratios.
Conclusion: Instead of using either sequences alone owing to low sensitivity and specificity rates, combined use of MRI techniques could easily improve the detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.Acta Radiol. 2008 Jun;49(5):602-10. doi: 10.1080/02841850802004983. Acta Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18568549
-
Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):91-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2198. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17179350
-
MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1583-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2540. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19933651
-
Proton MR spectroscopy of the prostate.Eur J Radiol. 2007 Sep;63(3):351-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.024. Epub 2007 Aug 20. Eur J Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17709223 Review.
-
Imaging prostate cancer.Radiol Clin North Am. 2012 Nov;50(6):1043-59. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.08.001. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 23122037 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cancer distribution: histopathological correlation with prostatectomy specimens.Prostate Int. 2014 Dec;2(4):188-95. doi: 10.12954/PI.14067. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Prostate Int. 2014. PMID: 25599075 Free PMC article.
-
The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1929-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2. Epub 2014 May 28. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24865693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrast enhancement by combining T1- and T2-weighted structural brain MR Images.Magn Reson Med. 2015 Dec;74(6):1609-20. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25560. Epub 2014 Dec 22. Magn Reson Med. 2015. PMID: 25533337 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: assessment of prognostic factors on pretreatment imaging.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Dec;12(12):5309-5325. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-184. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022. PMID: 36465820 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 17;8(44):77975-77989. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20316. eCollection 2017 Sep 29. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29100440 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical