Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 20;7(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-2.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography

Affiliations

Evaluation of gastrointestinal injury in blunt abdominal trauma "FAST is not reliable": the role of repeated ultrasonography

Afshin Mohammadi et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: To determine the diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and repeated FAST in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Methods: In this retrospective study we collected the data of all patients from September 2007 to July 2011 with gastrointestinal injury. The intraoperative outcome was compared with FAST technique and the repeated or delayed sonography.

Results: A total number of 1550 patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent FAST in a period of 4 years in our hospital. Eighty-eight (5.67%) patients were found to have gastrointestinal injury after exploratory laparotomy. Fifty-five (62.5%) patients had isolated gastrointestinal injury and 33 (37.5%) patients had concomitant injury to the other solid organs. In those with isolated gastrointestinal injury, the sensitivity of FAST was 38.5%. Repeated ultrsonography was performed in 34 patients with false negative initial FAST after 12-24 hours. The sensitivity of repeated ultrasonography in negative initial FAST patients in detection of gastrointestinal injury was 85.2% (95% CI, 68.1%, and 94.4%).

Conclusion: Repeated sonography after 12 to 24 hours in patients with negative initial FAST but sustain abdominal symptom can facilitated a diagnosis of GI tract injury and can be as effective method instead of Computed tomography in developing country.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Longitudinal sonogram show free fluid (arrow) associated with Ileal perforation in pelvic cavity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasonogram revealed free fluid in the paracolic gutter (right) and perisplenic (left).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Abdominal CT scan with lung window shows free air adjacent to liver edge due to colon perforation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mohammadi A, Daghighi MH, Poorisa M, Afrasiabi K, Pedram A. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma. Iran J Radiol. 2008;5(3):135–139.
    1. Brown MA, Casola G, Sirlin CB, Budorick N, Patel N, Hoyt DB. Blunt abdominal trauma: screening US in 2,693 patients. Radiology. 2001;218:352–358. - PubMed
    1. Brown MA, Sirlin CB, Hoyt DB, Casola G. Screening ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma. J Intensive Care Med. 2003;18:253–260. doi: 10.1177/0885066603256103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGahan JP, Richards J, Gillen M. The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan: pearls and pitfalls. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:789–800. - PubMed
    1. Pinto F, Bignardi E, Pinto A, Rizzo A, Scaglione M, Romano L. Ultrasound in the triage of patients after blunt abdominal trauma: our experience in 3,500 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2002;225:358.

LinkOut - more resources