Effect of communicating depression severity on physician prescribing patterns: findings from the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-based Treatment (COMET) trial

Abstract

Objective: In this secondary analysis from the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-based Treatment trial (COMET), we evaluated whether providing primary care physicians with patient-reported feedback regarding depression severity affected pharmacological treatment patterns.

Method: Intervention-arm physicians received their patients' 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores monthly. Odds of having no change in antidepressant treatment during the 6-month study period were calculated. Relationships between depression symptom status (partial or nonresponse) at month 3 and treatment changes in months 3 through 6 were assessed.

Results: Among 503 intervention and 412 usual care (UC) patients with major depressive disorder, most received antidepressant monotherapy at baseline (79.4% UC vs. 88.4% intervention; P=.047). Few switched their baseline antidepressant (17.4%), increased their dose (12.4%) or augmented with a second medication (2%). Odds of having no change in antidepressant therapy did not differ significantly between study arms (odds ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.88; P=.392). Few month 3 partial or nonresponders had a regimen change over the following 3 months; the study arms did not differ significantly (partial responders: 4.1% UC vs. 7.7% intervention; P=.429; nonresponders: 14.6% UC vs. 15.9% intervention; P=.888).

Conclusions: Among depressed patients treated in primary care, little active management was observed. The lack of treatment modification for the majority of partial and nonresponders was notable.