Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;3(1):65-74.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.154. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Considering anger from a cognitive neuroscience perspective

Affiliations
Review

Considering anger from a cognitive neuroscience perspective

R J R Blair. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to consider anger from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Five main claims are made: first, reactive aggression is the ultimate behavioral expression of anger and thus we can begin to understand anger by understanding reactive aggression. Second, neural systems implicated in reactive aggression (amygdala, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal gray; the basic threat system) are critically implicated in anger. Factors such as exposure to extreme threat that increase the responsiveness of these systems, should be (and are in the context of posttraumatic stress disorder), associated with increased anger. Third, regions of frontal cortex implicated in regulating the basic threat system, when dysfunctional (e.g., in the context of lesions) should be associated with increased anger. Fourth, frustration occurs when an individual continues to do an action in the expectation of a reward but does not actually receive that reward, and is associated with anger. Individuals who show impairment in the ability to alter behavioral responding when actions no longer receive their expected rewards should be (and are in the context of psychopathy) associated with increased anger. Fifth, someone not doing what another person wants them to do (particularly if this thwarts the person's goal) is frustrating and consequently anger inducing. The response to such a frustrating social event relies on the neural architecture implicated in changing behavioral responses in nonsocial frustrating situations. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:65-74. doi: 10.1002/wcs.154 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Brain Function and Dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berkowitz L. Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1993.
    1. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC, Takahashi LK. Attack and defensive behaviour in the albino rat. Animal Behavior. 1977;25:197–224. - PubMed
    1. Panksepp J. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Gregg TR, Siegel A. Brain structures and neurotransmitters regulating aggression in cats: implications for human aggression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2001;25(1):91–140. - PubMed
    1. Blair RJR. The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behavior. Brain and Cognition. 2004;55(1):198–208. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources