Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;40(12):617-9.

Assessment of ipsilateral versus contralateral proximal fibula for use in distal radius osteoarticular reconstruction

Affiliations
  • PMID: 22268007

Assessment of ipsilateral versus contralateral proximal fibula for use in distal radius osteoarticular reconstruction

Oluwaseun Akinbo et al. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Which fibula to harvest for distal radius reconstruction, ipsilateral or contralateral, is subject to debate. In this study, we investigated which proximal fibula is better suited for distal radius osteoarticular reconstruction based on radiographic parameters. Twenty-one proximal fibulas were harvested from adult cadavers. Radiographic fibular inclination angle (coronal plane) and radiographic fibular articular tilt (sagittal plane) were measured, and these parameters were compared with corresponding radius parameters. Mean radiographic fibular inclination angles were 25° (right) and 26° (left), and mean radiographic fibular articular tilts were 13° (right) and 13° (left). The native volar tilt of the radius is re-created when the ipsilateral proximal fibula (with proper styloid placement) is transferred to the ipsilateral wrist; conversely, a dorsal tilt is created when the contralateral proximal fibula is transferred. The ipsilateral proximal fibula is therefore a better radiographic match for distal radius osteoarticular reconstruction in the group we studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources