Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;38(4):313-7.

Choosing the right stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in poor, normal, and hyper-responders

  • PMID: 22268260
Review

Choosing the right stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in poor, normal, and hyper-responders

J H Check et al. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the advantages of low-dose stimulation for poor responders, the pros and cons of low dose vs high dose stimulation for normal responders and multiple strategies for hyper-responders especially to reduce the risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation protocol.

Methods: Various strategies are described for these three types of responders.

Results: Poor responders do best with mild stimulation protocols. Conventional stimulation protocols for normal responders have the advantage of providing embryos for future embryo transfers assuming the IVF center has a good cryopreservation program. Mild stimulation protocols save money for normal responders. There are many strategies for hyper-responders to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome including mild stimulation, high LH/FSH ratio for stimulation combination, GnRH agonist instead of hCG and using clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitors.

Conclusions: It is important to choose the right protocol for a given patient. An infertile couple can often help in making the decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources