Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
- PMID: 22269063
- PMCID: PMC4778078
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002898
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
Abstract
Objective: To assess current beverage consumption patterns and anticipated reaction to an added 20 % tax on these products.
Design: A random-digit dialled telephone interview lasting 20 min was administered to assess demographics, beverage consumption behaviours and intentions regarding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the event of an additional tax on these beverages.
Setting: Respondents were recruited throughout the USA.
Subjects: The study included 592 adults.
Results: Sixty-nine per cent of respondents reported consuming at least one pre-packaged sugar-sweetened beverage in the past week; those who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages averaged seven pre-packaged beverages per week. Ninety-one per cent knew that frequent consumption of soft drinks increases risk of obesity. Thirty-six per cent supported a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages with greatest support among those aged 18-24 years, those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 and those with higher levels of education (P < 0·05). Over one-third of respondents said that they would cut back on their sweetened beverage consumption in the event of an added 20 % tax on these beverages.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an added tax on these beverages could influence some to cut down on their consumption, reducing their risk of obesity and related illnesses.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Demand and Tax Simulation for Federal Food Assistance Participants: A Case of Two New England States.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):549-558. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0399-1. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29916153
-
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28419108 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue.Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 3. Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 21443899
-
Dietary sugar and body weight: have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes?: health be damned! Pour on the sugar.Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):950-6. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2085. Diabetes Care. 2014. PMID: 24652725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Australian paradox: a substantial decline in sugars intake over the same timeframe that overweight and obesity have increased.Nutrients. 2011 Apr;3(4):491-504. doi: 10.3390/nu3040491. Epub 2011 Apr 20. Nutrients. 2011. PMID: 22254107 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Acceptance of Key Public Health Interventions by the Polish Population Is Related to Health Literacy, But Not eHealth Literacy.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):5459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155459. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32751180 Free PMC article.
-
Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: A thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites.PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0186750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186750. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29166399 Free PMC article.
-
Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Juice, Artificially-Sweetened Soda and Bottled Water: An Australian Population Study.Nutrients. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):817. doi: 10.3390/nu12030817. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32204487 Free PMC article.
-
Public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and its associated factors in the Netherlands.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2354-2364. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020001500. Epub 2020 Jun 4. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 32495730 Free PMC article.
-
Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state.Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2263-73. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002699. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Public Health Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25430945 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:561–578. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Fact Sheet; Obesity and Cancer: Questions and Answers. [accessed October 2010];2004 http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/obesity.
-
- Goldman D, Michaud CP, Lakdawalla D, et al. The fiscal consequences of trends in population health. Natl Tax J. 2010;63:307–330.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous