Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
- PMID: 22269063
- PMCID: PMC4778078
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002898
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
Abstract
Objective: To assess current beverage consumption patterns and anticipated reaction to an added 20 % tax on these products.
Design: A random-digit dialled telephone interview lasting 20 min was administered to assess demographics, beverage consumption behaviours and intentions regarding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the event of an additional tax on these beverages.
Setting: Respondents were recruited throughout the USA.
Subjects: The study included 592 adults.
Results: Sixty-nine per cent of respondents reported consuming at least one pre-packaged sugar-sweetened beverage in the past week; those who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages averaged seven pre-packaged beverages per week. Ninety-one per cent knew that frequent consumption of soft drinks increases risk of obesity. Thirty-six per cent supported a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages with greatest support among those aged 18-24 years, those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 and those with higher levels of education (P < 0·05). Over one-third of respondents said that they would cut back on their sweetened beverage consumption in the event of an added 20 % tax on these beverages.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an added tax on these beverages could influence some to cut down on their consumption, reducing their risk of obesity and related illnesses.
Figures
(solid), no;
(hatched), yes) among a random-digit dialled telephone sample of US adults (n 592), April 2009–June 2010. None of the differences were statistically significant (χ2 test)References
-
- Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:561–578. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Fact Sheet; Obesity and Cancer: Questions and Answers. [accessed October 2010];2004 http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/obesity.
-
- Goldman D, Michaud CP, Lakdawalla D, et al. The fiscal consequences of trends in population health. Natl Tax J. 2010;63:307–330.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
