Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;65(5):497-502.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.008. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2

Affiliations

US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2

Gregory A Maglinte et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Objective: US general population norms for mail administration of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) were established in 1998. This article reports SF-36v2 telephone-administered norms collected in 2005-2006 for adults aged 35-89 years.

Study design and setting: The SF-36v2 was administered to 3,844 adults in the National Health Measurement Study (NHMS), a random-digit dial telephone survey. Scale scores and physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were computed.

Results: When compared with 1998 norms (mean=50.00, standard deviation [SD]=10.00), SF-36v2 scores for the 2005-2006 general population tended to be higher: physical functioning (mean=50.68, SD=14.48); role limitations due to physical health problems (mean=49.47, SD=14.71); bodily pain (mean=50.66, SD=16.28); general health perceptions (mean=50.10, SD=16.87); vitality (mean=53.71, SD=15.35); social functioning (mean=51.37, SD=13.93); role limitations due to emotional problems (mean=51.44, SD=13.93); mental health (mean=54.27, SD=13.28); PCS (mean=49.22, SD=15.13); MCS (mean=53.78, SD=13.14). PCS and MCS factor scoring coefficients were similar to those previously reported for the 1998 norms. SF-36v2 norms for telephone administration were created.

Conclusion: The higher scores for NHMS data are likely due to the effect of telephone administration. The 2005-2006 norms can be used as a reference to interpret scale and component summary scores for telephone-administered surveys with the SF-36v2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
National Health Measurement Study (NHMS) Sample Selection.

References

    1. Hays RD, Stewart AL. The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychol Assess. 1990;2:22–30.
    1. Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Wells KB, Nelson EC, Kamberg CJ, et al. Summary and discussion of MOS measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Duke University Press; Durham, NC: 1992. pp. 345–71.
    1. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey update. Spine. 2000;25:3130–9. - PubMed
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute; Boston, MA: 1993.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME. User's manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. 2nd ed. QualityMetric Incorporated; Lincoln, RI: 2007.

Publication types