Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan 24;9(4):189-95.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.2.

Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence

Affiliations
Review

Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence

Harveer S Dev et al. Nat Rev Urol. .

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Although cancer control is the primary goal, secondary outcomes such as continence recovery are of great importance to patients. Thus, it is a challenge for prostate cancer surgeons to optimize continence outcomes without compromising oncologic results. Many high-volume surgeons have demonstrated excellent long-term continence rates in their patients, but early continence is variable and less than ideal even in expert hands. A plethora of individual technical maneuvers exist to optimize early recovery of continence, but as yet there is no composite technique that incorporates the relevant anatomic principles of minimizing damage to the urinary sphincters and their nerves, maximizing functional urethral length, creating a secure and watertight vesicourethral anastomosis, providing circumferential fascioligamentous support to the anastomosis and external sphincter, and ameliorating postoperative bladder descent. Our ten-step approach to collating these individual maneuvers into a unified technique could be used by surgeons to obtain the best possible early recovery of urinary control for their patients, without risking their oncologic outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Jun;5(3):188-94 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1992 Jun;147(6):1566-73 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):991-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):179-92 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1707-13 - PubMed

MeSH terms