Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;35(6):658-73.
doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9398-0. Epub 2012 Jan 22.

Who benefits from psychosocial interventions in oncology? A systematic review of psychological moderators of treatment outcome

Affiliations

Who benefits from psychosocial interventions in oncology? A systematic review of psychological moderators of treatment outcome

Rie Tamagawa et al. J Behav Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Medical and demographic characteristics and psychological morbidity of individuals with cancer prior to a psychosocial intervention can influence the efficacy of interventions. However, little is known about the moderating role of patients' psychosocial characteristics on intervention effects. This review sought to identify and synthesize the impacts of psychosocial moderators of the effect of psychosocial interventions on the psychological well-being of cancer patients. A systematic review of the published literature was conducted. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection. Randomized controlled studies examining a moderator effect of patients' psychosocial characteristics other than baseline depression and anxiety levels were included. Of 199 potential papers, a total of 20 studies, involving 3,340 heterogeneous cancer patients are included. Of the 17 potential psychosocial moderators examined in this review, 14 significantly moderated the effects of interventions. Moderators were categorized into personality traits, mental and physical quality of life, social environment, and self-efficacy. Patients with poorer quality of life, interpersonal relationships and sense of control benefitted more from interventions than those who already had adequate resources. Patients with low levels of optimism and neuroticism, high levels of emotional expressiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and dispositional hypnotizability also showed greater benefits from various interventions. This review adds to the growing literature aimed at personalizing psychosocial cancer treatment by identifying who benefits from which psychosocial interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Support Care Cancer. 2003 Feb;11(2):79-83 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309 - PubMed
    1. Health Psychol. 2001 Jan;20(1):20-32 - PubMed
    1. Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):219-47 - PubMed
    1. Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;29(4):460-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources