Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?
- PMID: 22271335
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2155-1
Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?
Abstract
Background: It is known that structured assessment of an operation can provide trainees with useful knowledge and potentially shorten their learning curve. However, methods for objective assessment have not been widely adopted into the clinical setting. This might be because of a lack of expertise using an assessment tool. The aim of this present study was to investigate if a validated laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment tool could be used by doctors with different levels of experience.
Methods: The study was conducted as an observer-blinded, prospective cohort study. Three video recordings of a right-side laparoscopic salpingectomy were distributed to ten chief physicians, eight residents (fourth year trainees), and two expert assessors (all in gynecology) in order to be assessed using a validated procedure-specific assessment tool. The three salpingectomies were selected because they easily showed the different operational levels: novice, intermediate, and expert. The two expert assessors, i.e., our gold standard, were familiar with the OSA-LS assessment scale, but the chief physicians and the residents were not. All participants were blinded to the fact that surgeons with different experience had performed the salpingectomies.
Results: No significant differences between the residents and chief physicians were observed in any of the three assessed operations: novice, p = 0.63; intermediate, p = 0.93; and expert, p = 0.93. The chief physicians and residents matched our gold standard in assessing the intermediate operation (p = 0.177), but not the novice operation (p = 0.005) or the expert operation (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Residents and chief physicians generated similar performance scores when assessing operations using a laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment scale, and they could distinguish performance levels between the surgeons. They matched the assessment score of our expert on the intermediate operation. We conclude that a procedure-specific assessment scale can be used by both residents and chief physicians when giving formative feedback.
Similar articles
-
Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale.BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):908-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01732.x. BJOG. 2008. PMID: 18485171
-
Traditional Versus Simulation Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 14. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26590067 Clinical Trial.
-
Video-Based Coaching for Laparoscopic Salpingectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep 1;144(3):358-365. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005677. Epub 2024 Jul 25. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39053009 Clinical Trial.
-
Preoperative Practice Paired With Instructor Feedback May Not Improve Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Operative Performance.J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Apr;9(2):190-194. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00238.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28439352 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Data-Driven Methodology to Comprehensively Assess Bone Drilling Using Radar Plots.JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jan 5;9(1):e23.00069. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00069. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar. JB JS Open Access. 2024. PMID: 38188189 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37099157 Free PMC article.
-
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review.BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w. BMC Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 34311735 Free PMC article.
-
Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1480-1497. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14840. Epub 2024 Apr 12. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38610108 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources