Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;26(7):2054-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2155-1. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?

Affiliations

Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?

Jeanett Oestergaard et al. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: It is known that structured assessment of an operation can provide trainees with useful knowledge and potentially shorten their learning curve. However, methods for objective assessment have not been widely adopted into the clinical setting. This might be because of a lack of expertise using an assessment tool. The aim of this present study was to investigate if a validated laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment tool could be used by doctors with different levels of experience.

Methods: The study was conducted as an observer-blinded, prospective cohort study. Three video recordings of a right-side laparoscopic salpingectomy were distributed to ten chief physicians, eight residents (fourth year trainees), and two expert assessors (all in gynecology) in order to be assessed using a validated procedure-specific assessment tool. The three salpingectomies were selected because they easily showed the different operational levels: novice, intermediate, and expert. The two expert assessors, i.e., our gold standard, were familiar with the OSA-LS assessment scale, but the chief physicians and the residents were not. All participants were blinded to the fact that surgeons with different experience had performed the salpingectomies.

Results: No significant differences between the residents and chief physicians were observed in any of the three assessed operations: novice, p = 0.63; intermediate, p = 0.93; and expert, p = 0.93. The chief physicians and residents matched our gold standard in assessing the intermediate operation (p = 0.177), but not the novice operation (p = 0.005) or the expert operation (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Residents and chief physicians generated similar performance scores when assessing operations using a laparoscopic procedure-specific assessment scale, and they could distinguish performance levels between the surgeons. They matched the assessment score of our expert on the intermediate operation. We conclude that a procedure-specific assessment scale can be used by both residents and chief physicians when giving formative feedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):77-83 - PubMed
    1. BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):908-16 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 2001 Jun;181(6):484-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):226-30 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):107-13 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources