Connecting science and practice in child and adolescent mental health services research
- PMID: 22271355
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-011-0399-z
Connecting science and practice in child and adolescent mental health services research
Abstract
Collaboration between researchers and stakeholder groups is a potentially powerful mechanism for strengthening the quality of mental health research and for amplifying its public health impact. For stakeholders, collaboration offers opportunities to help shape research questions; participate in data collection and interpretation; and improve local capacity to access and use research findings. For researchers, collaboration can build understanding of what stakeholders want and need from research; enhance capacity to frame research questions and findings in language and metrics of value to stakeholders; and provide opportunities to contribute science-backed knowledge to decision-making processes in real world settings. Key stakeholder groups can include the recipients and providers of care, public and private care systems, health plans, schools, family service and faith-based organizations, correctional systems, and employers providing mental health benefits. This commentary reflects on the path that NIMH has taken in fostering researcher-stakeholder collaboration, particularly regarding child and adolescent mental health research. It describes the goals that NIMH set out to achieve, steps taken to realize those goals, lessons learned from those efforts, and possible next steps.
Similar articles
-
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15629972
-
Organizational adaptation: bridging the research to practice gap.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0275-2. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010. PMID: 20143149
-
Finding the common core: evidence-based practices, clinically relevant evidence, and core mechanisms of change.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0277-0. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010. PMID: 20140488
-
Mental health services system research: the National Institute of Mental Health program.Health Serv Res. 1988 Feb;22(6):837-55. Health Serv Res. 1988. PMID: 2831177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
NIH Roundtable on Opportunities to Advance Research on Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):551-64. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.562. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 21036295
Cited by
-
Development and Evaluation of Two Integrated Care Models for Children Using a Partnered Formative Evaluation Approach.Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):445-456. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.445. eCollection 2018. Ethn Dis. 2018. PMID: 30202198 Free PMC article.
-
Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions.JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Jul 9;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4361. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015. PMID: 27025279 Free PMC article.
-
Remote assessment via video evaluation (RAVVE): a pilot study to trial video-enabled peer feedback on clinical performance.BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1905-3. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31852496 Free PMC article.
-
A pilot survey of clergy regarding mental health care for children.Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:742410. doi: 10.1155/2012/742410. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Depress Res Treat. 2012. PMID: 22778933 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
