Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method
- PMID: 22271765
- PMCID: PMC3274511
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr532
Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, one-seventh of cervical cancers occur in China, which lacks a national screening program. By evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected cervicovaginal specimens tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA (Self-HPV testing) in China, we sought to determine whether Self-HPV testing may serve as a primary cervical cancer screening method in low-resource settings.
Methods: We compiled individual patient data from five population-based cervical cancer-screening studies in China. Participants (n = 13 140) received Self-HPV testing, physician-collected cervical specimens for HPV testing (Physician-HPV testing), liquid-based cytology (LBC), and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Screen-positive women underwent colposcopy and confirmatory biopsy. We analyzed the accuracies of pooled Self-HPV testing, Physician-HPV testing, VIA, and LBC to detect biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe (CIN2+) and CIN3+. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Of 13 004 women included in the analysis, 507 (3.9%) were diagnosed as CIN2+, 273 (2.1%) as CIN3+, and 37 (0.3%) with cervical cancer. Self-HPV testing had 86.2% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity for detecting CIN2+ and 86.1% sensitivity and 79.5% specificity for detecting CIN3+. VIA had statistically significantly lower sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ (50.3%) and CIN3+ (55.7%) and higher specificity for detecting CIN2+ (87.4%) and CIN3+ (86.9%) (all P values < .001) than Self-HPV testing, LBC had lower sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ (80.7%, P = .015), similar sensitivity for detecting CIN3+ (89.0%, P = .341), and higher specificity for detecting CIN2+ (94.0%, P < .001) and CIN3+ (92.8%, P < .001) than Self-HPV testing. Physician-HPV testing was more sensitive for detecting CIN2+ (97.0%) and CIN3+ (97.8%) but similarly specific for detecting CIN2+ (82.7%) and CIN3+ (81.3%) (all P values <.001) than Self-HPV testing.
Conclusions: The sensitivity of Self-HPV testing compared favorably with that of LBC and was superior to the sensitivity of VIA. Self-HPV testing may complement current screening programs by increasing population coverage in settings that do not have easy access to comprehensive cytology-based screening.
Figures



Comment in
-
Is it time to introduce HPV self-sampling for primary cervical cancer screening?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Feb 8;104(3):166-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr544. Epub 2012 Jan 23. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012. PMID: 22271766 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11. Gynecol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24631450
-
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
-
HPV detection in a self-collected vaginal swab combined with VIA for cervical cancer screening with correlation to histologically confirmed CIN.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Dec;290(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3321-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. PMID: 25009070
-
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Lancet Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24433684 Review.
-
High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.Int J Cancer. 2013 May 15;132(10):2223-36. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27790. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Int J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 22907569 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of antiviral AV2 in the topical treatment of HPV-associated lesions of the cervix: Results of a phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 16;15:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100377. eCollection 2019 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019. PMID: 31193477 Free PMC article.
-
HPV Testing Behaviors and Willingness to Use HPV Self-sampling at Home Among African American (AA) and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) Women.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2485-2494. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01184-4. Epub 2021 Nov 15. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022. PMID: 34780021 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Collected Specimens Revealed a Higher Vaccine- and Non-Vaccine-Type Human Papillomavirus Prevalences in a Cross-Sectional Study in Akuse.Adv Prev Med. 2020 Jan 22;2020:8343169. doi: 10.1155/2020/8343169. eCollection 2020. Adv Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 32411484 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and Feasibility of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Sep;25(9):944-51. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5469. Epub 2016 Feb 18. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 26890012 Free PMC article.
-
Education efforts may contribute to wider acceptance of human papillomavirus self-sampling.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-54. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S56307. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 25674016 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917. - PubMed
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Cervix Cancer Screening, Chapter 2. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005.
-
- Belinson J, Qiao YL, Pretorius R, et al. Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(2):439–444. - PubMed
-
- The Lancet. Women's health in rural China. Lancet. 2009;374(9687):358. - PubMed
-
- Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(5):1095–1101. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical