Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Sep;25(9):1682-9.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.657278. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix

Edgar Hernandez-Andrade  1 , Roberto Romero, Hyunyoung Ahn, Youssef Hussein, Lami Yeo, Steven J Korzeniewski, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Sonia S Hassan
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix

Edgar Hernandez-Andrade et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of transabdominal sonographic measurement of cervical length in identifying patients with a short cervix.

Methods: Cervical length was measured in 220 pregnant women using transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (US). Reproducibility and agreement between and within both methods were assessed. The diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal US for identifying cases with a cervical length <25 mm was evaluated.

Results: Twenty-one out of 220 cases (9.5%) had a cervical length <25 mm by transvaginal US. Only 43% (n = 9) of patients with a short cervix were correctly identified by transabdominal US. In patients with a cervical length of <25 mm by transvaginal US, transabdominal measurement of the cervix overestimated this parameter by an average of 8 mm (95% LOAs, -26.4 to 10.5 mm). Among women without a short cervix, transabdominal US underestimated cervical length on average (LOA) by 1.1 mm (95% LOAs, -11.0 to 13.2 mm). Transvaginal US was also more reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient: (ICC) (0.96; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97) based on comparisons between 2D images and immediately acquired 3D volume datasets relative to transabdominal US (ICC: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.84). Transvaginal US detected 13 cases with funneling and six cases with sludge whereas only three cases of funneling and one of sludge were detected by transabdominal US.

Conclusion: Transabdominal measurement overestimated cervical LOA by 8 mm among women with a short cervix and resulted in the underdiagnosis of 57% of cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD007235. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A. Cervical assessment in women with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 May;17(5):309–12. - PubMed
    1. Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Torii Y, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov;5(6):305–9. - PubMed
    1. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;22(3):305–22. - PubMed
    1. Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;101(2):402–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms