Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;20(7):715-21.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.278. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries

Affiliations

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries

Pascal Borry et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

An increasing number of private companies are now offering direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services. Although a lot of attention has been devoted to the regulatory framework of DTC genetic testing services in the USA, only limited information about the regulatory framework in Europe is available. We will report on the situation with regard to the national legislation on DTC genetic testing in seven European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Portugal, France, Germany, the United Kingdom). The paper will address whether these countries have legislation that specifically address the issue of DTC genetic testing or have relevant laws that is pertinent to the regulatory control of these services in their countries. The findings show that France, Germany, Portugal and Switzerland have specific legislation that defines that genetic tests can only be carried out by a medical doctor after the provision of sufficient information concerning the nature, meaning and consequences of the genetic test and after the consent of the person concerned. In the Netherlands, some DTC genetic tests could fall under legislation that provides the Minister the right to refuse to provide a license to operate if a test is scientifically unsound, not in accordance with the professional medical practice standards or if the expected benefit is not in balance with the (potential) health risks. Belgium and the United Kingdom allow the provision of DTC genetic tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ledley F. A consumer charter for genomic services. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:767. - PubMed
    1. Foster MW, Royal CDM, Sharp RR. The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:635–638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard HC, Borry P. Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying. Am J Bioethics. 2009;9:11–13. - PubMed
    1. Howard HC, Borry P.Is there a doctor in the house? The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context J Community Genet 2011. in press). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell PB, Meiser B, Wilde A, et al. Predictive and diagnostic genetic testing in psychiatry. Clin Lab Med. 2010;30:829–846. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms