Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009:3:142.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2009.142. Epub 2009 May 12.

Comparison between endoscopic and surgical treatment of screen-detected versus non-screen-detected colorectal cancers

B Andreoni  1 , C Crosta, A Sonzogni, Me Pirola, A Pavan, L Bisanti, C Senore, R Sassatelli, R Sguinzi, E Bertani, Pp Bianchi, Ac Chiappa
Affiliations

Comparison between endoscopic and surgical treatment of screen-detected versus non-screen-detected colorectal cancers

B Andreoni et al. Ecancermedicalscience. 2009.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Video 1:
Video 1:
20 mm flat lesion of the caecum. Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine shows glandular pattern typical for neoplastic adenomatous flat lesions. http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2009.142
Video 2:
Video 2:
The lesion described above is removed by single-piece mucosectomy after submucosal injection of saline to elevate the flat lesion http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2009.142
Video 3:
Video 3:
Endoloop-assisted polypectomy to prevent bleeding for a 4-cm peduncolated adenoma with a broad stalk. http://www.ecancermedicalscience.com/view-article.asp?doi=10.3332/ecancer.2009.142
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Pathological aspect of a malignant polyp.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Histology—malignant polyp with mucinous aspects.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Grading—low-grade malignant polyp (G2).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Grading—high-grade malignant polyp (G3).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Vascular invasion (a–c).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Vascular invasion (a–c).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Vascular invasion (a–c).
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
(a) Budding; (b) Low-grade budding.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
(a) Budding; (b) Low-grade budding.
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
Microstaging—infiltration width and depth.
Figure 8:
Figure 8:
Positive margins.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Smiljanic S, Gill S. Patterns of diagnosis for colorectal cancer: Screening Detected vs Symptomatic Presentation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:573–7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9193-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodyear SJ, Stallard N, Gaunt A, Parker R, Williams N, Wong L. Local impact of the English arm of the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Study. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1172–9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindholm E, Brevinge H, Haglind E. Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1029–36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreoni B, Bertani E, Bellomi M, Orecchia R, Zampino M, Fazio N, et al. Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5(73) doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-73. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources