Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:5:213.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.213. Epub 2011 May 24.

Aspirin, salicylates and cancer: report of a meeting at the Royal Society of Medicine, London, 23 November 2010

No authors listed

Aspirin, salicylates and cancer: report of a meeting at the Royal Society of Medicine, London, 23 November 2010

No authors listed. Ecancermedicalscience. 2011.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Any use of aspirin or NSAID in cases of colorectal cancer versus age and sex matched controls: 19 case–control studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maximum use of aspirin or NSAID in cases of colorectal cancer versus age- and sex-matched controls: 19 case–control studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Colorectal cancer in the pooled analysis. UK-TIA cases with at least 5 years scheduled trial treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Delayed effect of aspirin on risk of colorectal cancer in the UK-TIA Trial and British Doctors Aspirin Trial in compliant patients with scheduled treatment ≥5 years.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pooled analysis of the effect of low-dose (75–300 mg) aspirin (thick line) versus control (thin line) on subsequent incidence and mortality due to colorectal cancer in TPT, SALT and UK-TIA.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pooled analysis of the effect of low-dose (75–300 mg) aspirin (thick line) versus control (thin line) on subsequent incidence of proximal colorectal cancer in BDAT, TPT, SALT and UK-TIA.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Pooled analysis of the effect of low-dose (75–300 mg) aspirin (thick line) versus control (thin line) on subsequent incidence of distal colon and rectal cancer in BDAT, TPT, SALT and UK-TIA.
Figure 1
Figure 1
CAPP1 trial: patients randomised to aspirin tended to have smaller ‘biggest polyps’ versus placebo, with a trend to significance in those treated for at least one year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post trial divergence of colorectal cancer incidence in the CAPP2 trial, aspirin versus placebo (n = 46).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lifetable analysis, time to first ‘Lynch Syndrome cancers’ (colorectal and endometrial) in the CAPP2 trial. Hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.41–0.96), P = 0.03.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of COX-2 by normal gastrointestinal cells, adenoma and colon cancer (adapted from Eberhart et al [1].).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunostaining for COX-2 (dark brown areas) in colorectal tumours. Samples A and B are negative for COX-2; samples C and D are positive for COX-2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Aspirin use after diagnosis and colorectal cancer-related and overall survival [3] (A) Colorectal cancer-related mortality (log rank P = 0.02). (B) Overall mortality (log rank P = 0.03).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dose of aspirin and risk of adenoma [4].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Dose of aspirin and risk of colorectal cancer in women [6].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dose of aspirin and risk of colorectal cancer in men.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relative risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding and dose of aspirin in the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohorts.
Figure 1
Figure 1
United Kingdom 1950–2003: males and females colorectal cancer mortality at ages 35–69.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study design for evaluating the efficacy of aspirin plus adjunctive therapy in adenoma prevention and targeting therapy.
Figure 1
Figure 1
NSAIDs – oesophageal cancer [6].
Figure 2
Figure 2
NSAIDs – stomach cancer [6].
Figure 3
Figure 3
NSAIDs – lung cancer [6].
Figure 4
Figure 4
NSAIDs – breast cancer [6].
Figure 5
Figure 5
NSAIDs – ovarian cancer [6].

Similar articles

References

    1. Elwood PC, Cochrane AL, Burr ML, et al. A randomized controlled trial of acetyl salicylic acid in the secondary prevention of mortality from myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1974;1:436–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rothwell PM, Fowkes FG, Belch JF, et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;377:31–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62110-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. Colorectal cancer risk, chronic illnesses, operations, and medications: case control results from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study. Cancer Res. 1988;48:4399–404. - PubMed
    1. Vainio H, Morgan G, Kleihues P. An international evaluation of the cancer-preventive potential of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:749–53. - PubMed
    1. Morgan G, Vainio H. NSAIDs and cancer prevention: a review of the recent evidence. Curr Topics Pharmacol. 2002;6:25–39.

LinkOut - more resources