Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012;7(1):e29849.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029849. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy

Collaborators
Meta-Analysis

Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy

Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Statin therapy reduces the risk of occlusive vascular events, but uncertainty remains about potential effects on cancer. We sought to provide a detailed assessment of any effects on cancer of lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with a statin using individual patient records from 175,000 patients in 27 large-scale statin trials.

Methods and findings: Individual records of 134,537 participants in 22 randomised trials of statin versus control (median duration 4.8 years) and 39,612 participants in 5 trials of more intensive versus less intensive statin therapy (median duration 5.1 years) were obtained. Reducing LDL-C with a statin for about 5 years had no effect on newly diagnosed cancer or on death from such cancers in either the trials of statin versus control (cancer incidence: 3755 [1.4% per year [py]] versus 3738 [1.4% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.96-1.05]; cancer mortality: 1365 [0.5% py] versus 1358 [0.5% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.08]) or in the trials of more versus less statin (cancer incidence: 1466 [1.6% py] vs 1472 [1.6% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.07]; cancer mortality: 447 [0.5% py] versus 481 [0.5% py], RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.06]). Moreover, there was no evidence of any effect of reducing LDL-C with statin therapy on cancer incidence or mortality at any of 23 individual categories of sites, with increasing years of treatment, for any individual statin, or in any given subgroup. In particular, among individuals with low baseline LDL-C (<2 mmol/L), there was no evidence that further LDL-C reduction (from about 1.7 to 1.3 mmol/L) increased cancer risk (381 [1.6% py] versus 408 [1.7% py]; RR 0.92 [99% CI 0.76-1.10]).

Conclusions: In 27 randomised trials, a median of five years of statin therapy had no effect on the incidence of, or mortality from, any type of cancer (or the aggregate of all cancer).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: AK and JS have received honoraria from Solvay for lectures related to these studies. CN has worked as a consultant for Merck. Most of the trials in this report were supported by research grants from the manufacturers of statins (Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer), but no support from the pharmaceutical industry has been received for this meta-analysis work. This does not alter the authors′ adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Effects of statin therapy on cancer incidence in each study.
In the left panel, unweighted rate ratios (RRs) are plotted for each trial of the comparison of first event rates between randomly allocated treatment groups, along with their 99% confidence intervals (CIs). Trials are ordered according to the absolute reduction in LDL cholesterol at 1 year within each type of trial comparison (statin versus control and more versus less statin). In the right panel, rate ratios are weighted per 1 mmol/L LDL cholesterol difference at 1 year. Totals and subtotals, together with their 95% CIs, are indicated by open diamonds.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Effects of statin therapy on cancer mortality in each study.
Symbols and conventions as in Figure 1. Deaths from cancers known to have been first diagnosed prior to randomization are excluded.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Effects of statin therapy on cancer incidence and mortality, by duration of treatment.
Symbols and conventions as in Figure 1.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Effects of statin therapy on cancer incidence and mortality, by baseline LDL cholesterol.
Symbols and conventions as in Figure 1. To convert from mmol/L to mg/dL divide by 0.02586.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. Effects of statin therapy on cancer incidence and mortality, by age and sex.
Symbols and conventions as in Figure 1.

References

    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–78. - PubMed
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs D, Blackburn H, Higgins M, Reed D, Iso H, et al. Report of the Conference on Low Blood Cholesterol: Mortality Associations. Circulation. 1992;86:1046–60. - PubMed
    1. Law MR, Thompson SG. Low serum cholesterol and the risk of cancer: an analysis of the published prospective studies. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:253–61. - PubMed
    1. Sharp SJ, Pocock SJ. Time trends in serum cholesterol before cancer death. Epidemiology. 1997;8:132–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources